Someone recently bought our

students are currently browsing our notes.

X

Hopkins v TL Dallas Group

[2004] EWHC 1379 (Ch)

Case summary last updated at 22/01/2020 14:05 by the Oxbridge Notes in-house law team.

Judgement for the case Hopkins v TL Dallas Group

Director signed letters of undertaking on behalf of his company to pay £1 million to company B. He did so fraudulently for his own benefit. Company B attempted to get payment from director’s company. Held:
 
·     Director does not have actual authority where he acts for:
i)         Improper purposes
ii)       Or in bad faith
·     Thus where director acts contrary to interests of his company, does not have actual authority.
·     This may be case where e.g. director signs contracts which are very onerous and disadvantageous for his company
 
Facts
·     Director did not have actual authority to sign letters.
Ø Did not fall within scope of his implied authority as director
Ø He acted in breach of fiduciary duty when doing so
·     In addition, Company B could not rely on ostensible authority
Ø very facts which amounted to breach of directors’ duty put Company B on notice of lack of authority
Ø i.e. transaction were sodisadvantageous to director’s own company that Company B should have known director was acting in breach of duty
–     or at the least, should have asked the other directors to confirm validity of transaction
Ø thus party cannot rely on ostensible authority where he is on notice of lack of authority

Have you seen Oxbridge Notes' best Company law study materials?

Our law notes have been a popular underground sensation for 10 years:

  • Written by Oxford & Cambridge prize-winning graduates
  • Includes copious adademic commentary in summary form
  • Concise structure relating cases and statutes into an easy-to-remember whole
  • Covers all major cases for LLB exams
  • Satisfaction guaranteed refund policy
  • Recently updated
Company law Notes

Company law Notes >>