Someone recently bought our

students are currently browsing our notes.

X

O’Brien v Associated Fire Alarms

[1968] 1 WLR 1916

Case summary last updated at 18/02/2020 20:12 by the Oxbridge Notes in-house law team.

Judgement for the case O’Brien v Associated Fire Alarms

P worked at D’s Liverpool branch. There was a shortage of work there and P refused D’s request to move to another branch. He was sacked, and P claimed this was redundancy (which D contested so as to avoid paying redundancy pay). CA held that, since there was no ‘mobility’ clause in P’s contract, whether express or implied, he could not have been sacked for breaching his contract. Rather, the dismissal must have been on grounds of redundancy. 

Have you seen Oxbridge Notes' best Labour Law study materials?

Our law notes have been a popular underground sensation for 10 years:

  • Written by Oxford & Cambridge prize-winning graduates
  • Includes copious adademic commentary in summary form
  • Concise structure relating cases and statutes into an easy-to-remember whole
  • Covers all major cases for LLB exams
  • Satisfaction guaranteed refund policy
  • Recently updated
Labour Law Notes

Labour Law Notes >>