This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

Omak Maritime Ltd v Mamola Challenger Shipping Co [2010] EWHC 2026 (Comm)

By Oxbridge Law TeamUpdated 29/07/2023 00:27

Judgement for the case Omak Maritime Ltd v Mamola Challenger Shipping Co

Claim every advantage to get a first in law
Contract Law Notes

Contract Law

Approximately 1511 pages

Contract law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambridge. These notes cover all the LLB contract law cases and so are perfect for anyone doing an LLB in the UK or a great supplement for those doing LLBs abroad, whether that be in Ireland, Hong Kong or Malaysia (University of London).

These were the best Contract Law notes the director of Oxbridge Notes (an Oxford law graduate) could find after combing through dozens of LLB samples from outstanding law students with the highest...


  • If a measure taken to reduce losses effectively eliminates the damage incurred, it nullifies any claim for damages that would have otherwise been valid.
  • The court recognized that the owners' decision to engage in short-term fixtures was a form of mitigation.


  • The charterers agreed to lease the vessel "MAMOLA CHALLENGER" from the owners for a period of 5 years. As per the charterparty, the owners were responsible for making specific modifications to the vessel.
  • In anticipation of these modifications, the owners incurred various expenses. However, when there were doubts about whether the charterers would go through with the agreement, the owners kept the vessel at Cape Town while waiting for clarification from the charterers.
  • Ultimately, the owners accepted that the charterers had effectively terminated the charter. The expenses the owners had incurred for the modifications turned out to be wasted as they provided no value or benefit to the owners.
  • Following the termination of the charterparty, the owners entered into several short-term fixtures for the vessel.
  • The tribunal determined that over the 5-year period that the charterparty would have been in effect, the owners earned or would earn more from these short-term fixtures compared to what they would have earned under the original charterparty. Moreover, the excess earnings from these fixtures exceeded the amount of the wasted expenditure incurred by the owners.


  • The pivotal aspect of the case is the concept of mitigation of losses. By pursuing these fixtures, the owners effectively mitigated their losses and earned additional profits, which surpassed the amount of damages they would have been entitled to claim.
Any comments or edits about this case? Get in touch

Related Content

We have 2,500+ case summaries! Take a look.
We are constantly adding case reviews to our database and have built up a massive amount of cases already. Go to: