Plaintiff and Defendant were drunk and Plaintiff was giving Defendant, who wasn’t wearing a seat belt, lift home, when Plaintiff lost control, causing the car to crash and Defendant was severely injured.
Held that on the balance of probabilities Defendant’s injuries would not have been lessened had he been wearing a seat belt. However where Plaintiff knew the driver had drunk e
nough to make it likely to impair to a dangerous degree the driver's capacity to drive properly and safely OR where Plaintiff had been drinking with the driver, in the knowledge that he would be given a lift home, so that by the time of driving Plaintiff’s perceptions as to Defendant’s ability to drive was impaired, Plaintiff would be guilty of contributory negligence.
The latter applied here.
Therefore Plaintiff’s damages were reduced by 20%.
Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get StartedThese product samples contain the same concepts we cover in this case.