Judgement for the case P v NASUWT
Table Of Contents
Plaintiff was a disruptive child in school but the school refused to expel him, despite him disrupting one of Defendant’s member’s classes.
Trade union balloted all but one of its members for a strike and the result was 25-1 in favour, the union failing to ballot one of its members by accident.
HL denied an injunction against the strike, saying that it was a ‘trade dispute’ within the meaning of s.244 TULRCA 1992 and that the failure to ballot 1 member was not fatal to the procedure as it was a ‘small accidental failure’ under Article 232B.
Lord Bingham
A genuine dispute between employees and their employers which related wholly or mainly to the job the employees were employed to do or the terms and conditions on which they were employed to perform it; that the dispute between the teaching staff and the head teacher, and governors, plainly related directly to their job, which was to teach Plaintiff, and was about the terms and conditions of their employment
For Further Study on P v NASUWT
Labour Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambridge...
Need instant answers? Our AI exam tutor is here to help.
Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get StartedSimilar Cases
Related Product Samples
These product samples contain the same concepts we cover in this case.
| Labour Law | Freedom Of Association Notes (13 pages) |
| Labour Law | Industrial Action Notes (19 pages) |
Labour Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambridge...
Since 2010, Oxbridge Notes has been a trusted education marketplace, supplying high-quality materials from top achievers at universities like Oxford, Cambridge, LSE, Harvard, and Yale.