Pirelli v Oscar Faber [1983] 2 AC 1
Judgement for the case Pirelli v Oscar Faber
Table Of Contents
Plaintiff contracted Defendant to design a chimney for them. The design was faulty and at a certain date Plaintiff discovered damage to the chimney.
-
Plaintiff sued Defendant and the question was from what period damages were accruing.
Plaintiff claimed damages from the point at which the defect occurred, whereas Defendant claimed that they ought to accrue from the moment of discovery or first moment when they could be reasonably discovered.
HL allowed Plaintiff’s claim for damages accruing from the moment that the defect was caused.
For Further Study on Pirelli v Oscar Faber
These are detailed case summaries (excerpts from cases - not paraphrase...
Need instant answers? Our AI exam tutor is here to help.
Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get StartedSimilar Cases
Related Product Samples
These product samples contain the same concepts we cover in this case.
| Commercial Remedies BCL | Radford V. De Froberville Notes (3 pages) |
Tort Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambridge. ...
Since 2010, Oxbridge Notes has been a trusted education marketplace, supplying high-quality materials from top achievers at universities like Oxford, Cambridge, LSE, Harvard, and Yale.