Nitrigin Eireann v Inco [1992] 1 All ER 854
Judgement for the case Nitrigin Eireann v Inco
Table Of Contents
Defendant supplied faulty pipes to Plaintiff. The first cracking in the pipes merely required Plaintiff to spend money on repair. The second cracking damaged Plaintiff’s other property.
Plaintiff sued Defendant for both instances.
May J
Held that the original cracking was purely for the cost of repair and therefore economic loss which, other than in special circumstances (see week 3) was not recoverable in negligence.
However the second cracking led to damage of property and could therefore go ahead.
For Further Study on Nitrigin Eireann v Inco
A collection of the best GDL notes the director of Oxbridge Notes (an O...
Tort Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambridge. ...
Need instant answers? Our AI exam tutor is here to help.
Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get StartedSimilar Cases
Related Product Samples
These product samples contain the same concepts we cover in this case.
| Tort Law | Actionable Damage Notes (19 pages) |
| Tort Law | Economic Loss Theory Notes (4 pages) |
| Tort Law | Negligence Law Notes (20 pages) |
| GDL Tort Law | Pure Economic Loss Notes (10 pages) |
Tort Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambridge. ...
Since 2010, Oxbridge Notes has been a trusted education marketplace, supplying high-quality materials from top achievers at universities like Oxford, Cambridge, LSE, Harvard, and Yale.