Someone recently bought our

students are currently browsing our notes.


Portman Buliding Society v Dusangh

[2000] 2 All ER (Comm) 221

Case summary last updated at 04/01/2020 19:33 by the Oxbridge Notes in-house law team.

Judgement for the case Portman Buliding Society v Dusangh

P was illiterate, spoke little English and was given a mortgage whose contract stated that P’s earnings were higher than they actually were. The mortgage was to help P’s son start up a business. P’s son guaranteed the father’s mortgage but became bankrupt and so couldn’t do it. The bank, D, began mortgage repossession proceedings when P failed to make the payments. P sought to stay the proceedings on the grounds that his agreement with his son was unconscionable. CA rejected this. 

Ward LJ: To show an unconscionable bargain, there was a need for one of the parties to have imposed objectionable terms in a way which affects that person's conscience. It was not enough to show that the bargain was hard, unreasonable or foolish because the concern is instead with the behaviour of the stronger party. “No unconscientious advantage had been taken of the father's illiteracy, his lack of business acumen or his paternal generosity. True it may be that the son gained all the advantage and the father took all the risk, but this cannot be stigmatised as impropriety.” 

Have you seen Oxbridge Notes' best Contract Law study materials?

Our law notes have been a popular underground sensation for 10 years:

  • Written by Oxford & Cambridge prize-winning graduates
  • Includes copious academic commentary in summary form
  • Concise structure relating cases and statutes into an easy-to-remember whole
  • Covers all major cases for LLB exams
  • Satisfaction guaranteed refund policy
  • Recently updated
Contract Law Notes

Contract Law Notes >>