Someone recently bought our

students are currently browsing our notes.


R (Bancoult) v Secretary of State for the Home Department

[2008] UKHL 61

Case summary last updated at 08/01/2020 14:39 by the Oxbridge Notes in-house law team.

Judgement for the case R (Bancoult) v Secretary of State for the Home Department

 Some pacific islanders from the British Indian Ocean Territory (BIOT- a British colony) had been forced to leave their islands to make way for a US naval base. A later home sec. drafted an order saying that they would be allowed to return without visas, following a court ruling. However before this could be implemented, the next home sec reversed the policy, claiming he had no need to follow it through since judicial review didn’t apply to policies enacted on monarchical prerogative (as this was). CA said prerogative powers ARE subject to judicial review and that colonial government was not an exempted subject matter. The islanders were allowed to return due to breach of human rights and procedural impropriety (the islanders had been given a legitimate expectation by the initial court and the previous home secretary that they could return). 

Have you seen Oxbridge Notes' best Administrative Law study materials?

Our law notes have been a popular underground sensation for 10 years:

  • Written by Oxford & Cambridge prize-winning graduates
  • Includes copious academic commentary in summary form
  • Concise structure relating cases and statutes into an easy-to-remember whole
  • Covers all major cases for LLB exams
  • Satisfaction guaranteed refund policy
  • Recently updated
Administrative Law Notes

Administrative Law Notes >>