The Lord Chancellor sought to take away several financial aids from poor litigants, e.g. power of Lord Chancellor to remit fees to court in cases of hardship.
The court granted an application of a poor litigant for judicial review on this matter because the rule would usurp from many people their constitutional right: access to the courts.
This was the case despite that an act of parliament conferred certain powers on the Lord Chancellor:
The court said that nothing in the legislation intended for the LC to be able to take away peopleβs constitutional right to access the courts.Β
A collection of the best GDL notes the director of Oxbridge Notes (an O...
Ask questions π Get answers π It's simple ποΈπποΈ
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get StartedThese product samples contain the same concepts we cover in this case.