This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

Re Barings (No.5) [1999] 1 BCLC 433

By Oxbridge Law TeamUpdated 04/01/2024 07:18

Judgement for the case Re Barings (No.5)

Table Of Contents

  • Barings was a Merchant Bank. Due to activities of one rogue trader in Far East, bank collapsed.

  • Disqualification proceedings were brought against three of its former directors who were based in London. Was alleged they had been guilty of serious failures of management in relation to rogue trader; for instance, they had:

    • Given rogue trader huge funding without proper inquiry

    • Not instituted appropriate internal management controls

Held

  • Director must maintain sufficient knowledge of company’s business to enable them to discharge their duties as directors

  • Where director lawfully delegates power, is not entitled to place unquestioning reliance on others to do their job

    • Rather must take reasonable steps to monitor delegee

  • Extent of this duty depends on facts

    • Where delegee is trustworthy and competent, less supervision required

FACTS

  • Directors occupied very senior position in company

  • Were paid very well

  • Had failed to comply with duties expected of them

    • Thus disqualification order was justified.

Any comments or edits about this case? Get in touch

For Further Study on Re Barings (No.5)

Company law Notes
805 total pages
1075 purchased

Company law notes fully updated for recent exams in the UK. These notes...

Need instant answers? Our AI exam tutor is here to help.

Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️

Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.

Get Started
Claim every advantage to get a first in law
Company law Notes
805 total pages
1075 purchased

Company law notes fully updated for recent exams in the UK. These notes...