Issue was as to how shares were to be valued for purposes of making buyout order.
“Fairness” is most relevant factor when setting price for buyout order.
As general principle, fair price is that which could have been obtained by Claimant on market
I.e. there will be a minority discount
However where company is “quasi-partnership”, conduct of parties is relevant.
If Claimant is unfairly prejudiced through no fault of his own, share price will be pro rata
I.e. value of shares is the average value of share in company based upon total value of all shares
if Claimant makes unilateral decision to leave company of his own accord and prejudice only occurs towards him as result of others learning of his decision, will be minority discount
I.e. Claimant has no automatic right to be bought out at full value where he wants to leave for reasons unrelated to the prejudice
if Claimant’s conduct justifies his exclusion from company, will be minority discount
Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get StartedThese product samples contain the same concepts we cover in this case.