Someone recently bought our

students are currently browsing our notes.

X

Re Macro (Ipswich)

[1994] 2 BCLC 354

Case summary last updated at 23/01/2020 18:06 by the Oxbridge Notes in-house law team.

Judgement for the case Re Macro (Ipswich)

C owned shares in two property-owning companies. These two companies had a property managing agent, the Thompsons. C believed two companies had suffered losses due to Thompsons committing various improprieties (e.g. charging excessive management charges to two companies). C therefore sued D, sole director of Thompsons, on grounds he had inadequately supervised his firm. Held:
 
·       Case distinguished from Re Elgindata
·       In Elgindata, management had simply been poor
·       Whereas in present case:
Ø  Were specific acts of mismanagement by Thompsons, which D failed to rectify
Ø  Some acts of mismanagement were repeated over many years
·       Thus on facts, acts of mismanagement were sufficiently serious to cause unfair prejudice to C.
 
Relevant here that D’s firm stood to gain from some the acts of mismanagement (e.g. the excessive charges).This possibly a key factor.

Have you seen Oxbridge Notes' best Company law study materials?

Our law notes have been a popular underground sensation for 10 years:

  • Written by Oxford & Cambridge prize-winning graduates
  • Includes copious adademic commentary in summary form
  • Concise structure relating cases and statutes into an easy-to-remember whole
  • Covers all major cases for LLB exams
  • Satisfaction guaranteed refund policy
  • Recently updated
Company law Notes

Company law Notes >>