Regentcrest v Cohen [2001] 2 BCLC 80
By Oxbridge Law TeamUpdated 04/01/2024 07:05
Reviewed ByOxbridge Law Team
Judgement for the case Regentcrest v Cohen
Table Of Contents
-
Test for good faith (under pre-2006 law) is entirely subjective
However the greater the detriment caused to company, harder it will be for Defendant to show he acted in good faith
Any comments or edits about this case? Get in touch
For Further Study on Regentcrest v Cohen
1,511 total pages
748 purchased
Contract law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambrid...
Need instant answers? Our AI exam tutor is here to help.
Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get StartedSimilar Cases
Related Product Samples
These product samples contain the same concepts we cover in this case.
| Contract Law | Contents Of Contracts Interpretation Consumer Rights Implied Terms Notes (67 pages) |
Claim every advantage to get a first in law
805 total pages
1075 purchased
Company law notes fully updated for recent exams in the UK. These notes...
Since 2010, Oxbridge Notes has been a trusted education marketplace, supplying high-quality materials from top achievers at universities like Oxford, Cambridge, LSE, Harvard, and Yale.