Someone recently bought our

students are currently browsing our notes.


Rolled Steel Products v British Steel Corporation

[1986] Ch 246 (CA)

Case summary last updated at 22/01/2020 14:42 by the Oxbridge Notes in-house law team.

Judgement for the case Rolled Steel Products v British Steel Corporation

D, Rolled Steel, gave a guarantee to Colvilles. C, British Steel, became the successor to Colvilles upon nationalisation of steel industry, and called upon guarantee agreement. The guarantee agreement was for benefit of a director of D (Shenkman).
At the board meeting where decision to grant guarantee was passed, vote was participated in only by Shenkman and one other director. However D’s articles stated that quorum requirement was 2, and that a director could only count towards a quorum where he had disclosed his interest in a proposed transaction. D thus claimed that as Shenkman had not declared his interest, he did not count towards quorum and therefore decision to enter guarantee was invalid, and thus made in absence of authority. Held:
·     Given Shenkman did not disclose his interest, was no actual authority.
Ostensible Authority
·     C has constructive notice of article requiring quorum of 2, and article requiring directors to disclose their interest to count towards quorum
Ø i.e. Ernest v Nichols
·     Thus necessary to look at whether C can be taken to have known of the internal irregularity causing the lack of quorum?
Ø is true that lack of quorum is an issue of internal procedure
Ø howeverC cannot rely on indoor management rule to overcome lack of quorum.
Ø This is because C saw a signed copy of minutes of D’s board meeting at which it was agreed to provide the guarantee, and these minutes contained no reference to Shenkman having declared his personal interest
Ø Therefore given that D 
a.    was taken to know of the quorum requirement in articles
b.    and knew that Shenkman had not declared his interest
c.    D was on notice of internal irregularity.
·     Indoor management rule cannot be relied upon by someone with actual notice of irregularity.
·     Therefore could be no ostensible authority.

Have you seen Oxbridge Notes' best Company law study materials?

Our law notes have been a popular underground sensation for 10 years:

  • Written by Oxford & Cambridge prize-winning graduates
  • Includes copious academic commentary in summary form
  • Concise structure relating cases and statutes into an easy-to-remember whole
  • Covers all major cases for LLB exams
  • Satisfaction guaranteed refund policy
  • Recently updated
Company law Notes

Company law Notes >>