Someone recently bought our

students are currently browsing our notes.


Secretary of State for Education v Tameside MBC

[1977] AC 1014

Case summary last updated at 05/01/2020 17:50 by the Oxbridge Notes in-house law team.

Judgement for the case Secretary of State for Education v Tameside MBC

A council had a comprehensive education policy. After an election, the new council reversed this and planned to create a grammar school education policy. The secretary of state had the power under s.68 Education Act to direct a LA as to the exercise of its powers “if he was satisfied” that it was behaving “unreasonably”. Here the secretary believed this because the LA would not have time to organise a selection policy in time. HL, ignoring the subjective wording of the act, held that the LA had not behaved unreasonably , applying the Wednesbury test. Therefore the secretary of state’s directions were unlawful. 
Lord Wilberforce: Given that the council had a political mandate to pursue the grammar schools policy and massively supported by parents, it would be impossible for the secretary of state to conclude that the decision was Wednesbury unreasonable. 

Have you seen Oxbridge Notes' best Administrative Law study materials?

Our law notes have been a popular underground sensation for 10 years:

  • Written by Oxford & Cambridge prize-winning graduates
  • Includes copious academic commentary in summary form
  • Concise structure relating cases and statutes into an easy-to-remember whole
  • Covers all major cases for LLB exams
  • Satisfaction guaranteed refund policy
  • Recently updated
Administrative Law Notes

Administrative Law Notes >>