Oxbridge Notes uses cookies for login, tax evidence, digital piracy prevention, business intelligence, and advertising purposes, as explained in our privacy policy.

Technical settings

Someone recently bought our

students are currently browsing our notes.

X

R v Parliamentary Commissioner for Administration, ex parte Balchin

[1997] JPL 917

Case summary last updated at 05/01/2020 18:38 by the Oxbridge Notes in-house law team.

Judgement for the case R v Parliamentary Commissioner for Administration, ex parte Balchin

  Sedley J held that a decision would be Wednesbury unreasonable if it disclosed an error of reasoning, which robbed the decision of its logical integrity. If such an error could be shown then it was not necessary for the applicant to show that the DM was ‘temporarily unhinged.’ 

Have you seen Oxbridge Notes' best Administrative Law study materials?

Our law notes have been a popular underground sensation for 10 years:

  • Written by Oxford & Cambridge prize-winning graduates
  • Includes copious adademic commentary in summary form
  • Concise structure relating cases and statutes into an easy-to-remember whole
  • Covers all major cases for LLB exams
  • Satisfaction guaranteed refund policy
  • Recently updated
Administrative Law Notes

Administrative Law Notes >>