HO had agreed with prisoners one policy that prisoners who had served a third of their sentence could apply for home leave, however the minister later decided that only those who had served half of their sentence would be able to apply.
CA denied an application for judicial review based on LE.
It refused the balancing-approach of Sedley J and said that the only substantive protection that could be offered was the Wednesbury unreasonableness standard.Β
Mr. Beloff characterised Sedley J.'s approach as heresy, and in my judgment he was right to do so. On matters of substance (as contrasted with procedure) Wednesbury provides the correct test.
Administrative Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and C...
Ask questions π Get answers π It's simple ποΈπποΈ
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get StartedThese product samples contain the same concepts we cover in this case.