GDL Law Notes > Cambridge/Bpp/College Of Law GDL Law Notes > GDL Constitutional and Administrative Law Notes

Unreasonableness And Irrationality Notes

This is a sample of our (approximately) 5 page long Unreasonableness And Irrationality notes, which we sell as part of the GDL Constitutional and Administrative Law Notes collection, a Distinction package written at Cambridge/Bpp/College Of Law in 2017 that contains (approximately) 331 pages of notes across 29 different documents.

Learn more about our GDL Constitutional and Administrative Law Notes

The original file is a 'Word (Docx)' whilst this sample is a 'PDF' representation of said file. This means that the formatting here may have errors. The original document you'll receive on purchase should have more polished formatting.

Unreasonableness And Irrationality Revision

The following is a plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our GDL Constitutional and Administrative Law Notes. This text version has had its formatting removed so pay attention to its contents alone rather than its presentation. The version you download will have its original formatting intact and so will be much prettier to look at.

Con & Ad: Unreasonableness and Irrationality Introduction

- Wednesbury unreasonableness: Associated Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corp [1948]. facts: W. had power under s1(1) Sunday Entertainment Act 1932 to grant licence 'subject to conditions as the authority thinks fit'; licence granted to APH to open Sundays, but condition that no-one under 15 allowed; APH challenged  CoA: not unreasonable. standard: [Ld Greene]: decision so unreasonable that no reasonable authority could have come to it.

- Controversial: 'unreasonableness' undefined - courts come close to impinging on role of executive. conflict with separation of powers - vs. principle of JR: legality + process of decision, not substance.
[Loveland]: 'more readily regarded as being concerned with the political + moral rather than (in the strict sense) the legal character of the decision concerned'). insufficient explanation of why unreasonable: intuitive: risk that disguises prejudice / policy decisions. lack of transparency + structure.
[Jowell & Lester]: test tautologous - unreasonable = decision which is not reasonable. not always followed: many decisions 'coldly rational'. too deferential?

Reformulation of the Wednesbury Test

- Irrationality: GCHQ [1985]: [Ld Diplock]. standard: decision which is so outrageous in its defiance of logic or accepted moral standards that no sensible person who had applied his mind to the question to be decided could have arrived at it.

****************************End Of Sample*****************************

Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our GDL Constitutional and Administrative Law Notes.