Someone recently bought our

students are currently browsing our notes.


Warner Bros v Nelson

[1937] 1 KB 209

Case summary last updated at 04/01/2020 14:58 by the Oxbridge Notes in-house law team.

Judgement for the case Warner Bros v Nelson

 Bette Davis (D), a well known film actor, contracted for one year to render her exclusive services to P. The contract contained a clause prohibiting D from rendering her acting services to any other company. However before the year expired D did perform for another company. P sought an injunction preventing D from performing elsewhere. The court held that while the general rule is that an injunction is not ordered when its effect is to enforce a contract for personal services, in this case D could do work other then acting and was not thereby compelled to work for P i.e. this would not be regarded as indirect specific performance. Also, damages were not an appropriate remedy. Dodgy: is she really free to quit her profession and take up something else? CW thinks not and that in reality this amounted to an order of specific performance. 

Have you seen Oxbridge Notes' best Contract Law study materials?

Our law notes have been a popular underground sensation for 10 years:

  • Written by Oxford & Cambridge prize-winning graduates
  • Includes copious academic commentary in summary form
  • Concise structure relating cases and statutes into an easy-to-remember whole
  • Covers all major cases for LLB exams
  • Satisfaction guaranteed refund policy
  • Recently updated
Contract Law Notes

Contract Law Notes >>