This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

BPTC Law Notes Alternative Dispute Resolution Notes

Institutional Arbitration Notes

Updated Institutional Arbitration Notes

Alternative Dispute Resolution Notes

Alternative Dispute Resolution

Approximately 357 pages

A collection of the best BPTC notes the director of Oxbridge Notes (an Oxford law graduate) could find after combing through dozens of samples from outstanding students with the highest results in England and carefully evaluating each on accuracy, formatting, logical structure, spelling/grammar, conciseness and "wow-factor".

In short, these are what we believe to be the strongest set of BPTC notes available in the UK this year. This collection of BPTC notes is fully updated for recent exams, ...

The following is a more accessible plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our Alternative Dispute Resolution Notes. Due to the challenges of extracting text from PDFs, it will have odd formatting:

INSITUTIONAL ARBITRATION

  • institutional arbitration - arbitral institution acts as authority in default / administrator or supervisor

  • ad hoc arbitration - no institution, only parties and arbitrator(s) involved

  • UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules 2010

    • UN agency - harmonises international commercial law within UN

    • govern arbitrations not otherwise governed by institution i.e. ad hoc arbitrations can use half way between ad hoc and institutional

  • history

    • ad hoc arbitration ancient

    • 1892 LCIA set up institutional started C19th

ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES

INSTITUTIONAL AD HOC
Pros Cons Pros Cons

Certain

  • keeps costs down

  • know basic procedure in advance

  • institution interprets own rules and these interpretations are well known by practitioners - cf precedent but non-binding

Uncertain

  • basic procedural rules must be decided by parties / decided by tribunal, unless provided by seat

  • uncertainty can affect cost and length

Flexible

  • institutions will in some circumstances depart from rules

Less flexible

some mandatory rules

Most flexible

parties free to agree (almost) everything

Overall faster

  • supervision + basic rules = reduction in time

  • 18 months - 2 years final award

BUT

  • more procedural hurdles e.g. scrutiny of award before release

Faster in one sense

  • fewer procedural hurdles

Overall slower

  • time spent on deciding issues fixed in institutional

  • AA - "reasonable time" will have to spend time negotiating / nailing down what is reasonable

Confidentiality i.e. non-disclosure guaranteed

  • obligation on parties and arbitrators

Confidentiality i.e. non-disclosure NOT guaranteed

  • depends on seat / whether parties agree

More enforceable

  • well-known institutions more clout in foreign courts

Less enforceable

  • no guarantee of quality of arbitration

Cheaper in some cases

  • institution retains power to determine cost of arbitration - costs subject to review and reasonableness

  • cap on hourly rate

More expensive in some cases

  • have to pay institution!

More expensive in some cases

  • no review of costs

  • no cap

High level of scrutiny

  • day to day support of secretariat

  • scrutiny of board on award / rules

Less scrutiny

Admin support

  • appointment of arbitrators

  • venue

  • exchange of documents

What kind of disputes go to institutional / ad hoc?

  • generally (but are exceptions)

    • small disputes ad hoc as don't have to pay institution

    • state-state disputes go ad hoc as don’t have to submit to private institution

  • BUT no set formula

Cost

  • not clear cut, depends on circumstances which cheaper

  • not necessarily cheaper for smaller institutions to go ad hoc

  • institutions usually not for profit - assist business community

  • arbitrators in ad hoc arbitrations ARE run for profit

  • pricing structures for institutional

    1. ad valorem system: cost is percentage of amount in dispute

    2. hourly rate

    • depends on circumstances which is cheaper

INSTITUTIONS

  • big 3:

  1. International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) - Paris

  2. London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA)

  3. American Arbitration Association (AAA)

  • also regional ones

  • trend towards more institutions

  • full list EXAM - know names

    • AAA American Arbitration Association wide range, domestic + international

    • CEDR Centre for Effective Dispute Resolution commercial, applies UNCITRAL rules

    • CIA Chartered Institute of Arbitrators for trade associations + prof bodies

    • CIETAC China International Economic + Trade international commercial ssssssss Arbitration Commission

    • FOSFA Federation of Oils Seeds + Fats Association commodity disputes

    • GAFTA Grain and Feed Trade Association commodity disputes

    • HKIAC Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre international commercial

    • ICC International chamber of Commerce international commercial, financial, technical

    • ICE Institute of Civil Engineer civil engineering

    • ICSID International Centre for Settlement of Investment investment disputes ffffffffffff ggggg gg Disputes

    • JCT Joint Contracts Tribunal building disputes

    • LCIA London Court of International Arbitration international commercial

    • LMAA London Maritime Arbitrators Association shipping

    • LME London Metal Exchange metals trade

    • PCA Permanent Court of Arbitration differences between states

    • SIAC Singapore International Arbitration Centre shipping, banking, insurance, construction

  • rules

    • UNCITRAL UN Commission on International international commercial contracts dd Trade Law

  • structure

    • court / board: non-permanent; supervisory; well-known practitioners, academics, retired judges volunteer; apply institutional rules; make decision

    • secretariat: permanent; admin of cases; headed by registrar

LEGAL STATUS OF INSTITUTIONAL RULES

  • contractual in nature - incorporate institutional rules into contract by reference, unless expressly agree to vary / exclude

  • agree to submit to future disputes authority of institution

STAGES

  1. initiate proceedings

    • file request with institution: basics of claim, contact details, constitution of tribunal

  2. send copy of request to respondent (sometimes institution does, sometimes C does)

  3. response to request

  4. tribunal appointed

    • parties nominate

    • institution confirm appointment (ensures impartiality, any challenges decided by institution)

  5. parties submit 'SoCs'

  6. usually hearing(s) (sometimes on papers)

  7. award(s) made in name of arbitrator send to institution

  8. scrutiny / review of award by instutution

FOUNTAIN COURT PODCASTS

BIAS

  • 3 routes to disqualification

    • automatic disqualification = decision maker = party and / or has direct interest in common with one party; subject to waiver i.e. man may not be judge in own cause

      • what type of interest? financial; shareholding in party; close connection of interests with related party

      • barristers - no financial interest (if no CFA)

      • solicitors share profit

    • actual bias = conclusive vitiating factor (largely redundant)

    • apparent bias = "real danger or real possibility of bias" cf s24(1)(a) AA "justifiable doubt"; objective test - perceptions of a "fair minded and informed...

Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our Alternative Dispute Resolution Notes.