Economics Notes > University Of Cambridge Economics Notes > British Economic History Notes

Did Victorian Britain Fail Essay

This is a sample of our (approximately) 6 page long Did Victorian Britain Fail Essay notes, which we sell as part of the British Economic History Notes collection, a Upper 2.1 package written at University Of Cambridge in 2009 that contains (approximately) 44 pages of notes across 9 different documents.

Learn more about our British Economic History Notes

The original file is a 'Word (Doc)' whilst this sample is a 'PDF' representation of said file. This means that the formatting here may have errors. The original document you'll receive on purchase should have more polished formatting.

Did Victorian Britain Fail Essay Revision

The following is a plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our British Economic History Notes. This text version has had its formatting removed so pay attention to its contents alone rather than its presentation. The version you download will have its original formatting intact and so will be much prettier to look at.

Supervision 5: Growth in late Victorian Britain British Economic History, Paper 5, Part I Essay 'There is no sign of failure in the late Victorian economy; all we observe is other
countries, predictably, catching up with Britain.' Discuss.

In the late 19th century, Britain's industrial superiority was increasingly challenged. The
share of world exports for the UK dropped from 20.2% in 1872 to 13.6.
The relative fall in

manufacturing exports was even more pronounced, as the world share of the UK in this
category fell from 45.5% to 26.8% in the same period.
At the same time, the shares of

competitors such as the USA and Germany rose steadily. These two countries attained
labour productivity levels in manufacturing which were 22% (Germany) and 93% (USA)
higher than in the UK in 1911.
Furthermore, Britain attained lower growth rates in real GDP:

The average growth rate from 1870 - 1913 was 1.9% in Britain, whereas Germany had a
growth rate of 2.8% and the US attained 4.2% in the same period.
Not only did Britain

compare unfavourably with its contemporary competitors, but its performance also lagged
behind its own benchmarks from earlier periods. Real GDP growth was higher from 1856­
1873, where the average figure was 2.2% p.a.
This seems to be a small gap, but can lead to

big differences over a longer period of time.
The question whether this relative decline of British industrial and economic performance can
be seen as failure of the late Victorian economy, or whether there was unrealized potential
for the British economy has been the topic of much debate. In 1970, Donald McCloskey wrote an article regarding this question with the title "Did
Victorian Britain fail?".6 In this article, he reached the conclusion that Victorian Britain did not
fail, but grew as fast as its labour and capital constraints would allow. McCloskey undertakes
his analysis by using the neo­classical growth model with the following equation for the
sources of growth:
δQ/Q = α*δK/K + β*δL/L + r*


****************************End Of Sample*****************************

Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our British Economic History Notes.