History Notes Age of Empire 1800-1914 Notes
Detailed notes regarding aspects of imperialism throughout the 19th century specifically with a small amount of crossover into the 20th. Historiographical analysis is provided with each topic.
Detailed topics:
'Old' vs 'New' imperialism (provides a solid historiographical base for the topic), East India Company to Raj (detailed notes on the history of British India), Scramble for Africa, Orientalism (Edward Said) and postcolonialism, The 'Civilising Mission' and the relationship between Imp...
The following is a more accessible plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our Age of Empire 1800-1914 Notes. Due to the challenges of extracting text from PDFs, it will have odd formatting:
‘Old’ vs. ‘New’ Imperialism
Classical Theories:
What came before the ‘New’ Imperialism?
John Seeley, The Expansion of England (1883)
Focus on:
Decades before the ‘new imperialism’
Pax Britannica (1815)
North America, West Indies and India
Constitutional and political relations
‘Anti-imperialism’ and colonial retraction:
Abolition of the slave trade (1807) and slavery (1833)
Congress of Vienna 1815 – French colonial losses
Iberian colonial losses/weakness
Repeal of Corn Laws (1846)
‘Responsible Government’ in Australasia from 1855 & Canada from 1867
Implied that English expansion was not deliberate; more like accidental expansion
The ‘Old’ Historiography:
1800-70 anti-imperial years and focus on colonial retraction
1870-1914 emergence of ‘new’ imperialism
Transition from ‘anti-imperial’ period to ‘new’ imperialism is the main focus of the debate
John. A. Hobson (1858-1940):
Imperialism: A Study (1902)
Liberal tendencies; critical of capitalism but not socialist
Argued that Imperialism was the outcome of long term, large scale economic developments
Industrialisation, combined with nationalism emerging in the 19th century, initiated the period of ‘new’ imperialism
Hobson places sole significance on economics; neglects importance of international competition/military power & influence
Argued that only a small section of society benefited from imperialism
‘New’ imperialism was distinct because there was no extension of political systems: autocratic
Noble aims used to justify imperial expansion (White-man’s burden)
Growth of production efficiency exceeded consumption potential; mal-distribution of consumption power (rather than increasing production efficiency) demanded the opening of new markets
Opening of new markets required overseas expansion
Influenced by second Anglo-Boer War (1899-1902) and ‘Great Depression’ 1873-1896
Focus on role of ‘sub-imperialists’
Cecil Rhodes, Nathaniel de Rothschild, Jameson raid
Significant role of individuals in imperial expansion and conflict
Dark side of the Boer War
Writing influenced by this; critical of imperialism
‘Great Depression’ 1873-96
Uneven economic growth and contraction, and under-consumption combined with a drop in prices led to a crash in the Vienna stock market; nations adopted protectionist measures and searched for new markets overseas
Imperial expansion
Transition from industrial to finance capital
Vladimir. I. Lenin (1870-1924):
Imperialism, the highest stage of capitalism: a popular outline (1916)
Classical Marxist interpretation
Massive influence from John Hobson
Imperialism:
‘monopoly stage of capitalism’
Beginning of the redistribution rather than initial distribution of the world would cause the inter-capitalist conflict that would eventually end in worldwide communist revolution
Territorial expansion was not initially imperialism; imperialism began in the 1900’s
Focus on redistribution
Writing to explain to origins of the First World War
Attempts to portray imperialism as the origins
Colonialism needed because capital was not profitable in domestic markets due to uneven development
Beginnings of investment of capital in potential
Imperialism accelerated capitalist development through the expansion of existing economic disparity – uneven development caused decay
More imperialism = quicker decay
Joseph A. Schumpeter (1883-1950):
Imperialism and social classes: two essays (1919)
Heavily influenced by the effects of WW1 alongside post-war colonial sentiment
Widespread anti-Imperialist feelings
Demise of German, Austro-Hungarian and Russian Empires
Democratisation, domestic reform, ‘self-determination’
Economist and sociologist
Focus on social effects unlike Lenin & Hobson
Favours free trade and laissez-faire capitalism
Imperialism
An irrational and ‘objectless’ inclination towards war and conquest
The effect of atavistic social structures and psychological modes of thought stemming from pre-capitalist times
Aristocratic values of militarism, power politics and autocracy
Believed Imperialism was destined to disappear
Does not think that imperialism and capitalism are intertwined at all and that they should be treated as distinct notions
Classical theory conclusions:
Focused on metropolitan impulses
‘New’ imperialism begins in 1873? Or 1900?
Focus on tropics and sub tropics
Finance capitalism – completely focused on economics
Atavistic (Schumpeter)
Imperialism the continuation of ‘aristocratic’ modes of behaviour
Nationalism and Jingoism prevalent
Challenges to traditional historiography:
John Gallagher & Ronald Robinson:
‘The Imperialism of Free Trade’ (1953)
Africa and the Victorians: the official mind of imperialism (1961)
Challenging ‘New’ Imperialism:
Contest the partition of imperialism into phases
Continuity in imperial policies
Continuity found by considering the ‘informal’ empires
Free trade IS and CAN BE imperialism
China
There were no colonial retractions, just transformations in the nature of control
Self-governing provinces were still under the control of the metropole
Territorial annexations continued throughout the 19th century
Punjab, Singapore, Cape colony etc.
Difference between the two ‘phases’ was the pace and quality of imperial expansion
Challenging ‘Economic’ Imperialism:
Can economics explain the colonial scramble of the late 19th century?
Was the scramble for Africa and subsequent annexations economically beneficial to the nations involved?
Lenin’s point about investment in potential
New colonies in Africa and East Asia saw the least amount of trade and investment
Formal annexations were a reluctant, involuntary and defensive mechanism
Last resort
‘Official mind’ of imperialism determines nature and method of expansion
Official mind is the ideas, perceptions and intentions of those who had a bearing on British imperial policies
National interest in...
Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our Age of Empire 1800-1914 Notes.
Detailed notes regarding aspects of imperialism throughout the 19th century specifically with a small amount of crossover into the 20th. Historiographical analysis is provided with each topic.
Detailed topics:
'Old' vs 'New' imperialism (provides a solid historiographical base for the topic), East India Company to Raj (detailed notes on the history of British India), Scramble for Africa, Orientalism (Edward Said) and postcolonialism, The 'Civilising Mission' and the relationship between Imp...
Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get Started