This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

History Notes Age of Empire 1800-1914 Notes

Age Of Empire 1800 1914 Notes

Updated Age Of Empire 1800 1914 Notes

Age of Empire 1800-1914 Notes

Age of Empire 1800-1914

Approximately 38 pages

Detailed notes regarding aspects of imperialism throughout the 19th century specifically with a small amount of crossover into the 20th. Historiographical analysis is provided with each topic.

Detailed topics:

'Old' vs 'New' imperialism (provides a solid historiographical base for the topic), East India Company to Raj (detailed notes on the history of British India), Scramble for Africa, Orientalism (Edward Said) and postcolonialism, The 'Civilising Mission' and the relationship between Imp...

The following is a more accessible plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our Age of Empire 1800-1914 Notes. Due to the challenges of extracting text from PDFs, it will have odd formatting:

‘Old’ vs. ‘New’ Imperialism

Classical Theories:

What came before the ‘New’ Imperialism?

John Seeley, The Expansion of England (1883)

  • Focus on:

    • Decades before the ‘new imperialism’

    • Pax Britannica (1815)

    • North America, West Indies and India

    • Constitutional and political relations

  • ‘Anti-imperialism’ and colonial retraction:

    • Abolition of the slave trade (1807) and slavery (1833)

    • Congress of Vienna 1815 – French colonial losses

    • Iberian colonial losses/weakness

    • Repeal of Corn Laws (1846)

    • ‘Responsible Government’ in Australasia from 1855 & Canada from 1867

  • Implied that English expansion was not deliberate; more like accidental expansion

The ‘Old’ Historiography:

  • 1800-70 anti-imperial years and focus on colonial retraction

  • 1870-1914 emergence of ‘new’ imperialism

    • Transition from ‘anti-imperial’ period to ‘new’ imperialism is the main focus of the debate

John. A. Hobson (1858-1940):

  • Imperialism: A Study (1902)

  • Liberal tendencies; critical of capitalism but not socialist

  • Argued that Imperialism was the outcome of long term, large scale economic developments

  • Industrialisation, combined with nationalism emerging in the 19th century, initiated the period of ‘new’ imperialism

  • Hobson places sole significance on economics; neglects importance of international competition/military power & influence

  • Argued that only a small section of society benefited from imperialism

  • ‘New’ imperialism was distinct because there was no extension of political systems: autocratic

  • Noble aims used to justify imperial expansion (White-man’s burden)

  • Growth of production efficiency exceeded consumption potential; mal-distribution of consumption power (rather than increasing production efficiency) demanded the opening of new markets

    • Opening of new markets required overseas expansion

  • Influenced by second Anglo-Boer War (1899-1902) and ‘Great Depression’ 1873-1896

    • Focus on role of ‘sub-imperialists’

      • Cecil Rhodes, Nathaniel de Rothschild, Jameson raid

        • Significant role of individuals in imperial expansion and conflict

    • Dark side of the Boer War

      • Writing influenced by this; critical of imperialism

    • ‘Great Depression’ 1873-96

      • Uneven economic growth and contraction, and under-consumption combined with a drop in prices led to a crash in the Vienna stock market; nations adopted protectionist measures and searched for new markets overseas

        • Imperial expansion

      • Transition from industrial to finance capital

Vladimir. I. Lenin (1870-1924):

  • Imperialism, the highest stage of capitalism: a popular outline (1916)

    • Classical Marxist interpretation

  • Massive influence from John Hobson

  • Imperialism:

    • ‘monopoly stage of capitalism’

    • Beginning of the redistribution rather than initial distribution of the world would cause the inter-capitalist conflict that would eventually end in worldwide communist revolution

  • Territorial expansion was not initially imperialism; imperialism began in the 1900’s

    • Focus on redistribution

  • Writing to explain to origins of the First World War

    • Attempts to portray imperialism as the origins

  • Colonialism needed because capital was not profitable in domestic markets due to uneven development

  • Beginnings of investment of capital in potential

  • Imperialism accelerated capitalist development through the expansion of existing economic disparity – uneven development caused decay

    • More imperialism = quicker decay

Joseph A. Schumpeter (1883-1950):

  • Imperialism and social classes: two essays (1919)

    • Heavily influenced by the effects of WW1 alongside post-war colonial sentiment

      • Widespread anti-Imperialist feelings

      • Demise of German, Austro-Hungarian and Russian Empires

      • Democratisation, domestic reform, ‘self-determination’

  • Economist and sociologist

    • Focus on social effects unlike Lenin & Hobson

  • Favours free trade and laissez-faire capitalism

  • Imperialism

    • An irrational and ‘objectless’ inclination towards war and conquest

    • The effect of atavistic social structures and psychological modes of thought stemming from pre-capitalist times

      • Aristocratic values of militarism, power politics and autocracy

    • Believed Imperialism was destined to disappear

  • Does not think that imperialism and capitalism are intertwined at all and that they should be treated as distinct notions

Classical theory conclusions:

  • Focused on metropolitan impulses

  • ‘New’ imperialism begins in 1873? Or 1900?

  • Focus on tropics and sub tropics

  • Finance capitalism – completely focused on economics

  • Atavistic (Schumpeter)

    • Imperialism the continuation of ‘aristocratic’ modes of behaviour

  • Nationalism and Jingoism prevalent

Challenges to traditional historiography:

John Gallagher & Ronald Robinson:

  • ‘The Imperialism of Free Trade’ (1953)

  • Africa and the Victorians: the official mind of imperialism (1961)

  • Challenging ‘New’ Imperialism:

    • Contest the partition of imperialism into phases

      • Continuity in imperial policies

    • Continuity found by considering the ‘informal’ empires

      • Free trade IS and CAN BE imperialism

        • China

    • There were no colonial retractions, just transformations in the nature of control

      • Self-governing provinces were still under the control of the metropole

    • Territorial annexations continued throughout the 19th century

      • Punjab, Singapore, Cape colony etc.

    • Difference between the two ‘phases’ was the pace and quality of imperial expansion

  • Challenging ‘Economic’ Imperialism:

    • Can economics explain the colonial scramble of the late 19th century?

      • Was the scramble for Africa and subsequent annexations economically beneficial to the nations involved?

        • Lenin’s point about investment in potential

    • New colonies in Africa and East Asia saw the least amount of trade and investment

    • Formal annexations were a reluctant, involuntary and defensive mechanism

      • Last resort

    • ‘Official mind’ of imperialism determines nature and method of expansion

      • Official mind is the ideas, perceptions and intentions of those who had a bearing on British imperial policies

    • National interest in...

Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our Age of Empire 1800-1914 Notes.