Someone recently bought our

students are currently browsing our notes.

X

Agreements, Collusion And Parallel Conduct Notes

Law Notes > Competition Law Notes

This is an extract of our Agreements, Collusion And Parallel Conduct document, which we sell as part of our Competition Law Notes collection written by the top tier of Oxford students.

The following is a more accessble plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our Competition Law Notes. Due to the challenges of extracting text from PDFs, it will have odd formatting:

Furse on agreements, collusion and parallel conduct Horizontal agreements may raise concern that competition is being harmed, but may be difficult to detect Problems of policing horizontal conduct may be exacerbated in oligopoly markets where there are a few competitors Cartel agreements may be difficult to put in place, but they have long-term success Vertical agreements are less likely to raise competitive concern, unless they are linked to the exercise of market power, or contribute to the exclusion of competitors from a market Horizontal restraints Horizontal agreements are those between firms at the same level of production or distribution In US, antitrust rules that price fixing is condemned per se, and is not subject to a rule of reason Trans-Missouri Freight Assoc The more concentrated a mkt is, the more likely that firms will be able to successfully dampen competition via collusion

1. Note suggestion by Cournot in 1838 that even assuming independent decisions made by oligopolists, prices in such a market would be higher than in perfectly competitive ones

2. They achieve a "Nash-Cournot" equilibrium Cartels Cartel = "Explicit arrangement designed to eliminate competition" Perfect cartel would be one in which the group as a whole set production where MC for the group equalled MR

3. I.e. the cartel would behave as a single-firm monopoly Two major problems face any cartel:

4. Agreement

5. Adherence Agreement Several factors make it difficult for members to reach this Product differentiation may mean members have to agree on a complex pricing scheme rather than a single price

6. Note this is a problem for OPEC, as oil is actually produced in different grades Larger firms, which can benefit from economies of scale, may want lower prices than smaller firms Adherence If a cartel is successful in restricting its joint output and raising price, it creates an incentive for individual member firms to cheat, expand their outputs and undermine the cartel

7. A single firm will always profit by cheating on the cartel

8. I.e. cartels are inherently unstable Cf Game theory: prisoner's dilemma - a dominant strategy leads to a sub-optimal outcome

Only if the two prisoners can exchange information during the process, and are prepared to forgo some short-term benefit in order to improve their collective position, can it be assumed that the outcome will be optimal to the two Action by authorities Given the difficulty of detecting cartels, most authorities attempt to implement measures designed to destabilise them

9. Largely based on pioneering work of George Stigler in 1964

1. Focused on fact that much cartel activity is secretive

2. Firms will be faced with a reduced demand as prices rise

3. Difficult for firms to determine whether demand reductions are the result of this or of cheating by other members

10. One of the tasks of comp policy is to make info exchange more risky - availability of hard physical evidence of cartelisation normally brings swift condemnation Activities of trade associations tend to be closely scrutinised by comp authorities Some argued that where cartels exist, they may be limited in harm

11. But recent evidence suggests otherwise, i.e. 2006 study showing overcharge may be as high as 40%
Price leadership It can be difficult to determine whether prices are being maintained across a cartel or whether price leadership is present Markham - there are 3 categories of price leadership: i. Dominant firm leadership - it is likely to be able to set prices as if it were a monopolist, and small firms have little to gain from diverging much ii. Barometric price leadership - characteristic of mkts where price leader changes frequently, response to any change in price tends to be less swift than in the situation where there is a dom firm, cf Zinc Powder Group iii. Markets where the product is homogenous and there are few producers facing similar costd - poses greatest problem for comp authorities; see UK in petrol industry Vertical restraints In case of most goods, there is a chain of production before the product reaches the customer

12. Vertical agreement is one between firms at different stages of production A vertical agreement is to some extent a substitute for vertical integration

13. Therefore surprising that EC, early on, attacked an agreement between a manufacturer and a distributor as being anti-competetive

1. Consten and Grundig, 1966 Chicago school argues broadly that all vertical restraints should be lawful

14. But today, economists are keen not to generalise Argument in favour of examining vertical restraints is that while they may encourage inter-brand competition, they may restrict intra brand competition (i.e. between two sellers of nike shoes)

15. This may not be a significant problem if the buyer has wide choice OFT Report puts forward 3 considerations

Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our Competition Law Notes.