This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

Law Notes Debt Restructuring Notes

Pre Packs Notes

Updated Pre Packs Notes

Debt Restructuring Notes

Debt Restructuring

Approximately 77 pages

Debt Restructuring Law notes recently updated for exams at top-tier British Universities. These notes, written at King's College London, cover all the LLB banking law cases and so are perfect for anyone doing an LLB in the UK or a great supplement for those doing LLBs abroad, whether that be in Ireland, Hong Kong or Malaysia (University of London). These were the best Debt Restructuring Law notes the director of Oxbridge Notes (an Oxford law graduate) could find after combing through over a hu...

The following is a more accessible plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our Debt Restructuring Notes. Due to the challenges of extracting text from PDFs, it will have odd formatting:


  • Comparing Chapter 11 under US law to Administration under English law

  • Pre-packs

Collectivisation and Privatisation:

  • Administration and Chapter 11 as collective insolvency procedures, aimed at solving the tragedy of the commons.

  • Features:

    • Comprehensive moratorium under administration;

    • Automatic stay under Chapter 11;

    • Control through administrator under administration or debtor-in-possession under Chapter 11;

    • Creditors have information and voting rights under both administration and Chapter 11;

    • Plan of reorganisation;

    • Cross-class cramdowns are possible under Chapter 11; and

    • Administration can be used together with a CVA or a scheme.

Contrasting Chapter 11 and Administration:

  • Control:

    • Chapter 11:

      • The debtor-in-possession remains in control;

      • Incumbent management;

      • Appointment of a trustee-in-bankruptcy is possible but rare; and

      • Appointment of an examiner is also possible (as in Lehman). He does not have the power to run the debtor’s business or to dispose of the debtor’s assets; he is merely charged with looking into the debtor’s affairs and determining what went wrong.

    • Administration:

      • An administrator comes into control (for large companies, a large partner-led team may come in from any one of the Big 4 accountants to perform the role of administrator);

      • The administrator is a qualified insolvency practitioners;

      • The administrator is given comprehensive management powers; and

      • Light-touch administration.

    • Does administration thus assume that management is somehow responsible for the plight of the company?

  • Advantages and Disadvantages:

    • Chapter 11:

      • “Incumbent management knows best”;

      • Suppliers and customers can continue dealing with a group of people that they are familiar with;

      • For certain small companies such as a restaurant with a chef-owner, the owner is likely to be essential to the running of the company;

      • But fraud is much less likely to be discovered.

    • Administration:

      • The professional expertise of an external administrator;

      • A “fresh pair of eyes”;

      • Administrators are officers of the court, and is thus subject to certain requirements regarding fairness and neutrality;

      • But it might be disruptive to the debtor’s business.

  • Post-petition financing:

    • Even after entering into a formal insolvency process, the debtor still needs an injection of cash to keep it functioning. How can the debtor possibly continue attracting financing when it is already in insolvency?

    • Chapter 11: Debtor-in-possession financing

      • Chapter 11 features an extremely attractive built-in mechanism for post-petition financing. The debtor-in-possession can continue to issue debt, beginning with unsecured debt with administration expense status. If that is not good enough to persuade lenders to lend to the debtor, the debtor-in-possession can apply to court to issue debts with even higher priority.

      • (1) Unsecured debt with administrative expense status; and, if not

      • (2) Unsecured debt with super-senior priority; and, if not

      • (3) Debt secured on unencumbered assets, or, if there are no longer any unencumbered assets available, then debt with a junior security interest over encumbered assets (n.b. this is only possible if value of the collateral is greater than that of the senior debt); and, if not

      • (4) Senior-secured debt with security over already-encumbered assets.

    • Administration:

      • Credit contracts entered into by the administrator take priority over: the fees and expenses of the administration; floating charges; but NOT fixed security.

      • This gives lenders a peace-of-mind to continue lending to the debtor.

    • Why the difference? Because administration is about “priming” the debtor for a pre-pack sale?

  • Cramdowns:

    • If all classes accept the plan, we are then in the realm of S1129(a), Chapter 11. S1129(a) sets out the basic requirements that must be met for the court to confirm the plan.

    • If however there are dissenting classes, we are then in the realm of S1129(b), Chapter 11. S1129(b) is sets out further requirements (in addition to those in S1129(a)) that must be met before the court can confirm the plan against the wishes of the dissenting classes.

      • Cross-class cramdowns are possible.

      • Dissenting unsecured creditors = The “absolute priority” rule. Claims junior to the cramdown-ed class cannot get anything as well.

      • Dissenting secured creditors = They must retain their lien and receive deferred cash payments equal to the value of their collateral.

      • Dissenting equity-holders = They must receive their fixed liquidation preference, or the junior equity-holders must get nothing as well.

    • Administration + Scheme of arrangement:

      • It is possible to have cramdowns on dissenting creditors within a class.

      • Cross-class cramdowns are however not possible.

      • Overcoming the above limitation through pre-packed assets transfers, thereby leaving junior debtors behind?

  • UK Reform Proposals:

    • BEIS, Insolvency and Corporate Governance: Government Response (26 August 2018).

    • Two additional standalone mechanisms.

    • Restructuring moratorium:

      • For solvent, but prospectively insolvent companies.

      • The company must not have been in administration (or any insolvency proceedings) for past 12 months.

      • For a duration of 28 days, extendable thereafter.

      • A debtor-in-possession system, but with an additional “monitor”. The monitor — a qualified insolvency practitioner — ensures the eligibility conditions have been met.

    • Restructuring plan procedure:

      • Similar to a scheme of arrangement.

      • Possibility of cross-class cramdowns, but subject to a weaker version of the US’s absolute priority rule.

      • It is weaker because English courts can still confirm the plan even if the rule is not met, so long as the plan is “fair and equitable”.

      • The “best interests of the creditors test” = The dissenting creditors must receive at least as much as they would under the next best alternative (which, under...

Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our Debt Restructuring Notes.