This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

Law Notes Environmental Law Notes

Air Quality Law Notes

Updated Air Quality Law Notes Notes

Environmental Law Notes

Environmental Law

Approximately 262 pages

A collection of the best Environmental Law notes the director of Oxbridge Notes (an Oxford law graduate) could find after combing through forty-eight LLB samples from outstanding law students with the highest results in England and carefully evaluating each on accuracy, formatting, logical structure, spelling/grammar, conciseness and "wow-factor". This set of notes earned its author a prize in exams.

We're confident you'll find these revision materials useful - check the samples below to decid...

The following is a more accessible plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our Environmental Law Notes. Due to the challenges of extracting text from PDFs, it will have odd formatting:

Air Quality Law Notes

What is the nature of air pollution problems?

Definition and Nature

Per Fisher, Scotford and Lange (2019) a dominant feature of air quality law is its anthropogenic nature.

  • Air pollution problems are both created by and detrimental to humans – as such, there is widespread pressure on politicians to improve air quality

One of the problems with air quality is that, historically, we have not worried about air pollution until we can see it or its effects – this means that regulation has largely been reactive and ad hoc.

  • Some of the solutions to air pollution over history have been to make it invisible

    • In the UK between the 1930s and 1970s, a key strategy in combatting air quality problems was the introduction of taller chimney stacks for industrial installations – these allowed for pollution dispersal at higher levels in the atmosphere and led to considerable improvements in (local) UK air quality

The Problem

Air pollution problems are largely a result of increased transport movements within European and a slow turnover of vehicle fleets

  • Our understanding of these developments is being greatly aided by advancements in the scientific community

    • BUT: air pollution is not just a question of scientific measurement

      • DePuis (2004) assesses air pollution regulation from a sociological perspective

        • He emphasises the existence of air pollution not in terms of scientific models and measurements or economic values, but rather as social artefacts: that is, the products of social interactions and relationships including inequalities knowledge, power and politic

Air pollution is not simply concerned with controlling excessive concentrations of pollutants in the air; it is a social construction that involves choices about what behaviour gets controlled, and who is to bear the primary benefit and cost of this

Pollutants

The diversity of the problem can be seen through the fact that there are a range of different pollutants.

  • Sulfur Dioxide (SO2); Nitrogen Oxide (NO) and Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2), collectively NOX – causes acid rain and dry acid deposition when they are oxidised in the atmosphere, which in turn causes the death of flora and fauna, degradation of soils, and the corrosion of buildings

  • Heavy Metal Particulates – these substances (including cadmium, lead and mercury) are emitted by combustion processes and are harmful to human health, potentially causing kidney, lung and bone problems (cadmium); and also acting as neurotoxins (lead and mercury)

  • Particulate Matter – this refers to any matter in the air that is very, very small (these are emitted directly into the air, mainly from combustion processes)

    • There is increasing evidence that dust particles of such small size can have deleterious effects on human health, particularly in causing respiratory illnesses and lung cancers, irrespective of the chemical composition of the pollutant.

  • Benzene, Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons, Dioxins and Furans – these are aromatic organic compounds which have toxic and carcinogenic effects, being able to alter DNA and even cause birth defects

  • Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) – these are toxic pollutants that bioaccumulate (that is, they bind to fatty tissues of living organisms, including humans) and pass between generations of food chains

  • Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) – these are organic compounds that are highly reactive under normal atmospheric conditions

What is the history of air quality law?

UK History

The history of air quality law in the UK is a long one, with air pollution controls being known to exist in the thirteenth century

  • Wilde (2010) notes the issues inherent in different regulatory techniques – the Alkali Act 1863 provides a nice example of the shortcomings of an approach to pollution control that relies solely upon monitor8ng exhaust pipe emissions

    • Emission limits are of limited effect unless they are informed by data on the cumulative effect of emissions on the receiving media

  • Private nuisance has also been used as a response to air quality problems

    • BUT: private nuisance actions could also undermine the improvement of overall air quality levels by contributing to longer-range air quality problems.

      • This is because, particularly after the case of Manchester Corp v Farnworth, air pollution will not be an actionable nuisance if released higher into the atmosphere (via higher chimney stacks) and then carried further afield.

International Developments

In 1941, the Train Smelter arbitration established that “no State has the right to use or permit the use of its territory in such a manner as to cause injury by fumes in or to the territory or another or the properties of persons therein, when the case is of serious consequence and the injury is established by clear and convincing evidence”.

  • This sort of customary law was insufficient

The primary international law control of transboundary polluting emissions today is now through regional treaties – including the 1979 Geneva Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution (CLRTAP)

  • CLRTAP was adopted in response to growing concerns as to the transboundary movements of acidifying pollutants

CLRTAP does not set air quality standards directly or set up liability rules for polluting states.

  • Rather, contracting parties agree to endeavour to “limit and, so far as possible, gradually reduce and prevent air pollution including long-range transboundary air pollution”

  • It contains important provisions on the sharing of information

Yaminneva and Romppanen (2017) argue that this system of international law does not provide a comprehensive response ot air pollution

  • This is so for the two reasons:

    1. Customary international law in the form of principles of international environmental law only has limited value – they are subject to divergence in interpretation

    2. Principles of international law gain their full functionality when they are operationalised in treaties and other legal...

Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our Environmental Law Notes.