Someone recently bought our

students are currently browsing our notes.


Contributory Negligence Notes

Law Notes > Tort Law Notes

Updates Available  

A more recent version of these Contributory Negligence notes – written by Oxford students – is available here.

The following is a more accessble plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our Tort Law Notes. Due to the challenges of extracting text from PDFs, it will have odd formatting:

Defences to Liability Contributory Negligence

Is by no means a complete defence o But can substantially decrease amount of damages that need to be paid out - although not to 100%, naturally. o Giliker: more popular among the Courts because it is less drastic than extinguishing the claim altogether such as with the other defences. o Principles enshrined in Law Reform (Contributory Negligence) Act 1945 s.1(1)
? Where any person suffers damage as a result

partly of his own fault

and partly of the fault of another person(s) o the claim shall not be defeated by reason of C being at fault
? but the damages will be reduced to the extent the court feels just and equitable

having regard to C's share in the responsibility for the damage.
? Giliker: damages will be reduced according to C's responsibility for the damage (and not the accident)

E.g. Froom v Butcher [1976] - X, passenger in car, not wearing a seatbelt when D crashes the car owing to negligence and X suffers preventable extent of damage as a result.

Definition of "Fault" of C o Law Reform (Contributory Negligence) Act 1945 s.4
? Negligence,
? breach of statutory duty
? OR other act or omission that gives rise to liability in tort,

or would, apart from the Act, give rise to the defence of contributory negligence

E.g. Fraud/Deceit = not contributory negligence by C o Reeves v Metropolitan Police Commissioner [2000]:
? Intentional acts included

Giliker: very generous interpretation of "fault" to say that it is "negligent" to deliberately commit suicide

Is rather artificial as well

Questions to find claim of contributory negligence o IS a SEPERATE issue from duty of care o All we're asking is whether C failed to exercise reasonable care and this contributed to his injury o Was C acting negligently?
? Jones v Livox Quarries [1952]:

X rode on a lorry by hanging onto the back, expressly disobeying his employer. The lorry stopped, and was then negligently run into by a dumper, crushing X between the vehicles and causing serious injury.
? Lord Denning:

A person is guilty of contributory negligence if he ought reasonably to have foreseen that,

Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our Tort Law Notes.

More Tort Law Samples