Tort Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambridge. These notes cover all the LLB tort law cases and so are perfect for anyone doing an LLB in the UK or a great supplement for those doing LLBs abroad, whether that be in Ireland, Hong Kong or Malaysia (University of London).
These were the best Tort Law notes the director of Oxbridge Notes (an Oxford law graduate) could find after combing through dozens of LLB samples from outstanding law students with the highest results in ...
The following is a more accessible plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our Tort Law Notes. Due to the challenges of extracting text from PDFs, it will have odd formatting:
Discharging common duty of care
Nature of Duty Owed
Duty Owed
Single duty owed by occupier to all lawful visitors regardless of purpose of entering
S.2(2): “Common duty
To take such care as in circumstances is reasonable
To see that visitor is reasonably safe in using premises
For purpose for which visitor invited or permitted by occupier to be there
Giliker: Act is visitor-centric rather than property centric
So inviting a blind man onto the premises will lead to a greater duty to take care of visitor than if sighted person invited
Thus liability can arise where occupier merely fails to protect a visitor
From danger on the premises
Thus proximity, regarding Occupiers Liability, is not a requirement.
Merely that O has invited C onto the premises.
Breaching Duty
Courts will have regard to the same general factors which would be considered in common law negligence action
E.g. Likelihood and foreseeability of risk materialising
Magnitude of loss if no steps taken
Difficulty in cost and practicality of taking precautions
S.2(3): Consider the “degree of care, and of want of care, which would ordinarily be looked for in such a visitor”
Special rules regarding children and professional visitors
Children
S.2(3)(a): Occupier must be prepared for children to be less careful than adults.
Jolley v Sutton LBC [2000]:
Lord Steyn: Occupiers should not underestimate ingenuity of children to do injuries to themselves
And should therefore be prepared to take appropriate precautions.
Giliker: occupiers liability often wide when it comes to children
Occupier not always liable for children coming to harm
Phipps v Rochester Corp [1955]:
Devlin J:
Big children are curious and D should take reasonable steps to ensure they don’t bring themselves to harm
Small children lack any understanding or care
And it would not be right for D to have to take great steps to protect them (more so than with big children)
When it is clear that what they need is to be accompanied by a parent/guardian
Parents shouldn’t be able to abrogate blame onto D when they themselves should be taking due care of small children and not just letting them roam.
Simkiss v Rhondda BC (1983):
But occupiers should give due regard to the social habits of the neighbourhood when taking precautions
Thus if building site becomes routinely recognised as playground by unaccompanied children
Occupier has duty to ensure these children are reasonably safe.
However, there is no duty to fence off a mountain just on the off chance that small children come there.
Professional Visitors
S.2(3)(b): Occupier can expect that person, in exercise of his calling
Will appreciate and guard against any special risks ordinarily incident to it
So far as occupier allows him free to do so
Giliker: essentially, if expert thinks they know best, they will be expected to take the required level of care for special risks their profession means they ought to be aware of.
Roles v Nathan [1963]: sweeps suffocate owing to monoxide poisioning which they claim to know about
Lord Denning MR
There are certain risks, appreciated by the 1957 Act s.(3)
Where occupiers are entitled to assume that men of their respective professions will know about and guard against
The risks to the sweeps here were special risks
But they were risks known by their calling
Might be a different result if the stairs of...
Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our Tort Law Notes.
Tort Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambridge. These notes cover all the LLB tort law cases and so are perfect for anyone doing an LLB in the UK or a great supplement for those doing LLBs abroad, whether that be in Ireland, Hong Kong or Malaysia (University of London).
These were the best Tort Law notes the director of Oxbridge Notes (an Oxford law graduate) could find after combing through dozens of LLB samples from outstanding law students with the highest results in ...
Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get Started