LOAN TRANSFERS
For a loan transfer question in the exam, take this approach:
What are Existing Lender’s key objectives?
RCF or term loan (fully drawn down)?
Does EL have further obligations?
Is there security and if so, what will happen to it?
Where are assets held?
What is needed to transfer benefit of security (if at all)?
Does EL needs funds or just to deal with internal credit issues?
Risk participation does not put EL in funds.
Commercial relationship issues
Is borrower consent needed/will borrower be notified?
Withholding tax/increased costs issues with NL
Consider each of the transfer methods in turn, linking back to the key objectives and applying the law to the facts.
Which method is the most suitable for EL to achieve its key objectives?
Reasons for loan transfers
Risk management (internal credit committee controls)
Capital adequacy (external controls)
Portfolio management
E.g. bank may want prestige and initial involvement or initial agency fees, but does not consider the interest rate on the loan to be high enough to keep the loan on its books
Non-performing loans (cutting losses and selling the loan to firms which specialize in distressed debt)
Syndication (may not be possible for a complete syndicate to be put together in time for signing; loan transfers achieve the secondary syndication)
Transfer objectives
Non-payment risk (will the method of transfer replace the risk of non-payment of borrower with non-payment of NL or remove the risk altogether?)
Availability of funds (for investing in new projects – EL must be put in funds)
Obligation to lend further amounts (must ensure that both rights and obligations assumed by NL and does not leave EL at risk for further amounts)
Regulatory concerns
Rescheduling risk
Practical issues
(a) Borrower’s consent
Borrower’s consent will ordinarily be required for novation or assignment.
Under the LMA, the Borrower consents in advance to:
any assignment (LMA-style) or transfer to another Lender or Affiliate of a Lender; or
any assignment or transfer made at a time when an EoD is continuing.
Provisions making it easier for EL to assign/novate:
Under the LMA, the Borrower implicitly consents to the use of ‘Transfer Certificates’ instead of full novation agreements.
The Borrower must not unreasonably withhold or delay consent to an assignment or transfer.
The Borrower will be deemed to have given its consent five Business Days after the EL has requested it.
The Borrower cannot withhold consent to an assignment or transfer solely because the assignment or transfer may result in an increase to the Mandatory Cost.
Provisions protecting the Borrower:
Under the LMA, the Borrower will not be liable for any increased costs which arise because of the novation/assignment on a secondary market loan transfer (note that primary syndication can occur after the loan agreement has been signed!)
This protects the buyer from having to pay more by way of increased costs or gross-up to the NL than the EL would have been entitled to. However, it may make it harder for EL to find a NL willing to take on the loan.
(b) Relationship
It may be important for EL to remain the ‘lender of record’, especially if its main purpose in entering the loan in the first place was to establish a relationship with the borrower.
Hence, it may be important to select a loan transfer method which allows the EL to continue to be the lender of record, even if it transfers the loan behind the scenes.
Can borrower’s consent be avoided?
Can confidential information be released to prospective NLs without borrower consent? [see below]
(c) Confidentiality
EL will have given an express confidentiality undertaking to the borrower. However, it will also wish to disclose confidential information to prospective NLs to market the transfer. It may not be able to do so without the consent of the borrower. HOWEVER, this would negate any benefit of not requiring borrower’s consent for certain transfer methods!
Provisions making it easier for the EL:
The LMA allows the disclosure of confidential information as the EL considers appropriate in the case of transfers or potential transfers, subject to NL entering into a confidentiality undertaking. This provision is not always included, so check every loan agreement!
(d) Secured loan
If a loan is secured, this will influence the method of transfer chosen as security is dealt with differently under the various methods of transfer
TRANSFER METHODS
| NOVATION (LMA) | ASSIGNMENT (LMA) | SUB-PARTICIPATION | RISK PARTICIPATION | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Documentation and Parties | Transfer Certificate between Agent, NL and EL. Borrower consents to use of such certificates in the LMA Agreement. | EL and NL execute an assignment agreement which is countersigned by the Agent. Addressed to both Agent and Borrower. Pro-forma LMA Assignment Agreement. | Agreement between EL and NL. Potential fee from EL to NL if margin on loan not sufficient to attract NL. | Agreement between EL and NL. Fee paid by EL to NL. |
| Consent is required, but given in advance for: 1. novation/assignment to an existing member of the syndicate or an affiliate of one of the existing syndicate members; and 2. if transfer is made at a time where an EoD is continuing. | Same position as LMA Novation. | No, unless loan agreement specifically provides otherwise. Would need consent to pass on Confidential Information to NL, unless ‘carve-out’ in agreement allowing EL to pass on confidential information to NL subject to NL entering into a confidentiality undertaking with EL. | Same position as sub-participation. | |
| Impact on relationship between EL and borrower? | Relationship may be compromised as borrower will be aware that NL is new lender of record. | Borrower will be notified of assignment so relationship may be compromised. Note under common law assignment, borrower will not be aware of un-notified assignment, but there will be risks for NL. | EL remains lender of record. | EL remains lender of record. |
| Balance sheet/capital adequacy position | Amount of the loan novated will be excluded from EL’s balance sheet/capital adequacy ratio. | As LMA assignment always notified, amount of loan assigned will effectively be excluded from EL’s balance sheet/CAR. | Drawn down amounts which have been funded by NL are excluded from EL’s balance sheet/CAR. Undrawn amounts remain on EL’s balance sheet/CAR until EL is put in funds by NL. | Loan is still included on EL’s balance sheet/CAR. However, NL’s identity may reduce percentage of capital which must be maintained. |
| EL put in funds? | Yes. | Yes, for all amounts drawn down as at transfer date. | Yes, with respect to drawn down amounts. | No. NL will only pay EL if borrower fails to pay. |
| Risks/burdens passed on to NL? E.g. default of borrower and future obligation to lend | All risks/burdens passed on – clean break. | Although burdens cannot be assigned at common law, LMA assignment is a contractual agreement by the NL to assume all obligations under the loan agreement. Therefore, all risks/burdens effectively passed to NL. | NL assumes borrower repayment risk in respect of drawn down amounts. If EL has future lending obligations, NL is usually required to match those future lending obligations, but there is no effective risk transfer in respect of those undrawn down amounts until the borrower’s further drawdown requests are actually funded by NL. Hence, EL retains rescheduling risk. IT may find itself in negotiations with the borrower and... |