LPC Law Notes > Cambridge/Oxilp/College Of Law LPC Law Notes > International Intellectual Property Notes

Eu Competition Law Notes

This is a sample of our (approximately) 4 page long Eu Competition Law notes, which we sell as part of the International Intellectual Property Notes collection, a 73% package written at Cambridge/Oxilp/College Of Law in 2015 that contains (approximately) 135 pages of notes across 29 different documents.

Learn more about our International Intellectual Property Notes

The original file is a 'Word (Doc)' whilst this sample is a 'PDF' representation of said file. This means that the formatting here may have errors. The original document you'll receive on purchase should have more polished formatting.

Eu Competition Law Revision

The following is a plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our International Intellectual Property Notes. This text version has had its formatting removed so pay attention to its contents alone rather than its presentation. The version you download will have its original formatting intact and so will be much prettier to look at.

EU COMPETITION LAW STEP 1: Which competition authority will investigate?

Serious EU Infringements: The Competition Directorate of the European Commission (i.e. The EU Commission) Less serious EU Infringements: Competition and Markets Authority (CMA)

STEP 2: What is the legal basis for its investigation and prosecution?
STATE: As we are dealing with an agreement for which its impact is felt within the EU, the legal basis of the investigation and prosecution will be based on Art.101 TFEU. STEP 3: Is there a breach of Art.101(1) TFEU?
STATE: Art.101(1) provides the general prohibition, prohibiting: "agreements between undertakings, decisions by associations of undertakings and concerted practices, which may affect trade between Member States and which have as their object or effect the prevention, restriction or distortion of competition within the internal market." STEP 4: Is there an agreement between undertakings?
STATE: The licence is between two separate economic entities in the market and constitutes an agreement expressing the parties' joint intention to conduct themselves on the market in a specified way. STEP 5: Does the agreement affect trade between Member States?
STATE: The effect on trade need only be 'actual or potential'. It is clearly present here because the proposed agreement will regulate trade between the parties in the EU. STEP 6: Does the agreement have as its object or effect the prevention, restriction or distortion of competition within the internal market?
STATE: As it stands, this agreement is anti-competitive. The following clauses/proposals are specifically anti-competitive…(address each anti-competitive clause in turn). Hardcore/object infringement

Re-sale price maintenance - such price fixing restricts the licensee's behaviour and distorts trade. Given free rein, [………] might well price below this level in order to respond to competitive pressures. [……….] is clearly trying to preserve its cachet and maximise earnings. Therefore, the object of this clause is clearly anti-competitive

Export Ban - restricts the commercial freedom of the licensee. Such clauses are automatically deemed to be anti-competitive as they reduce consumer choice and partition the market.

Effect infringement

Exclusive licence - accompanied by territorial restrictions, this may have the effect of being anti-competitive. By promising not to licence to anyone else in the territory, this affects trade within the EU.

Exclusive grant backs by the licensee on improvements - the obligation on
[……..] to assign improvement IP rights to [……..] is anti-competitive in that it imposes an obligation on[…….] to assign something that, in law, is theirs to sell or licence freely. Clearly the effect of this is to distort competition.

****************************End Of Sample*****************************

Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our International Intellectual Property Notes.