This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

Medicine Notes Embryology, Histology & Anatomy Notes

Limb Development Essay

Updated Limb Development Essay Notes

Embryology, Histology & Anatomy Notes

Embryology, Histology & Anatomy

Approximately 37 pages

This set includes lengthy, detailed tutorial essays on the following subjects:
-what is a stem cell?
-To what extent is cell polarity an essential and unique component of epithelial cells?
-How do we know that dystrophin is a critical protein in muscle cells and what do we understand of its function in these cells? (revelant to Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy)
-To what extent is the development of the kidney an ideal model to study epithelial-mesenchyme interactions? (includes an informative desc...

The following is a more accessible plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our Embryology, Histology & Anatomy Notes. Due to the challenges of extracting text from PDFs, it will have odd formatting:

What do we currently know of the molecular control of limb development, and what remain the major gaps in our present understanding of this process?

Vertebrate embryonic limb development starts with the development of limb buds, which occurs in humans at day 24 for upper limb buds and around day 28 for the lower limb buds. Limb buds form as a bulge of mesodermal mesenchyme cells covered by ectodermal epithelium, the distal margin of which forms the apical ectodermal ridge (AER). Limb induction is the patterning process whereby the cells which form the limb bud are selected, and involves signalling between genes including Hox and GDF11, and areas such as the intermediate mesoderm (IM), somites, the organiser and lateral plate mesoderm (LPM). Each limb bud must grow along three axes, the dorsal-ventral (DV) axis, the cranial-caudal (CC) axis, and the proximal-distal (PD) axis. Limb bud growth is maintained by Fgf signals emitted from the AER. PD patterning is induced by signalling pathways including that of the Hox genes. The combination of these is responsible for growth of the stylopod, zeugopod and autopod regions of the limb. In the upper limb, these form, respectively, the upper arm containing the humerus, the forearm containing the radius and ulnar, and the wrist and hand. The lower limb is analogous. DV axis patterning depends on the positional interplay between signalling factors, primarily Wnt7a and Lmx1d. There is another signalling centre in the posterior mesoderm of the limb bud, the zone of polarising activity or ZPA, which is partially responsible for the CC axis and expresses Shh, Fgfs and the Bmp family. Finally, additional Shh, Gli3 and Bmp signals in the interdigital necrotic zone induce apoptosis to free digit rays from the digital plates.

In limb induction, limb fields are specified from lateral plate mesoderm by a combinatorial Hox code. At the level of the limb buds, expression domains of genes Hoxc6, Hoxc8, and Hoxb5 have boundaries, which specify a CC axis. Mice lacking the Hoxb5 gene have an elevated shoulder girdle2. Studies of Hox genes in snakes where forelimbs do not develop, and of Hox expression domain shifts in mutant mice and chicks, confirm that limb bud field is specified by a certain combination of levels of Hox expressions in overlapping domains. However, the factors determining the boundaries of Hox gene expressions are not entirely elucidated. GDF11 is implicated as GDF11-deficient mice display posterior limb displacement and it seems to pattern the embryonic trunk CC axis; promyelocytic leukemia zinc finger protein may also regulate Hox expression2. Several signalling factors are involved in limb bud initiation: Fgf, T-box genes, retinoic acid (RA) and Wingless. Fgf-10 expressed by cells in the lateral plate mesoderm is known to initiate AER formation8, however Fgf-8 is responsible for limiting Fgf-10 expression to only areas where limbs should develop9; an Fgf-soaked bead will induce develop of an extra limb when applied to chick interlimb flank1. Limb buds cannot develop in grafts which exclude somites, the organiser and the IM. These tissues express Fgf and other factors which could influence limb bud outgrowth and patterning, but exactly how they work is not known2.

Evidence for the importance of the AER maintaining limb bud growth until full length comes from experiments where premature removal of the AER results in truncated limbs. In experiments in chick embryos, the later the AER is removed from the elongating limb, the more developed along the PD axis the limb is. In cases where the AER is not maintained, such as in snakes, whales, chick wingless mutants and mouse limb deformity mutants, limb buds fail to develop.1 The AER stimulates outgrowth by expressing Fgf; these signals have been shown to partially rescue limb bud development where the AER has been removed.2 Several other factors are also important here: Shh maintains AER Fgf expression via the Bmp antagonist Gremlin, which inhibits Bmp repression of AER function. In mice lacking Gremlin, certain Fgfs are absent or reduced in expression and truncation results1. It is evident that outgrowth occurs by cell proliferation at the limb tip, i.e. underneath the AER, as cell labelling with carbon or Indian ink provides a β€˜fate map’ of cells in the limb bud.3

Patterning along the PD axis is partially by cumulative expression of the Hox family, expression here moving to the 5’ end of the chromosome (although this expression is thought to be stimulated by the Fgf family). Initially, in the limb bud, only Hoxd-9 is expressed. Hoxd-10 is additionally expressed in formation of the stylopod, followed by Hoxd-11 for the zeugopod and proximal wrist, Hoxd-12 for the distal wrist and carpals, and Hoxd-13 for the metacarpals and phalanges.1 The Hoxa...

Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our Embryology, Histology & Anatomy Notes.