This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

Psychology Notes Intro to Biological and Cognitive Psych (1st year) Notes

Intro To Animal Psych Notes

Updated Intro To Animal Psych Notes

Intro to Biological and Cognitive Psych (1st year) Notes

Intro to Biological and Cognitive Psych (1st year)

Approximately 38 pages

Topics include: biological psych, perception, animal psych, and consciousness. Relevant evidence for each topic is outlined, including methodology and findings. The notes cover a wide span of sub-topics within each larger topics, providing a comprehensive introduction to the topics.

These notes are informative, to the point, and easy to follow. They are drawn from a wide range of sources utilising additional course reading and independent reading....

The following is a more accessible plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our Intro to Biological and Cognitive Psych (1st year) Notes. Due to the challenges of extracting text from PDFs, it will have odd formatting:

Darwin Natural Selection
Romanes

Used anecdotes

Hierarchy animal int – linear

Insects birds Animals Humans

Lloyd-Morgan

Opposed Romanes and anthropomorphism

Shouldn’t attribute behaviours to complexity if they can be explained more simply

Thorndike

Trial and error learning

Studied cats using puzzle boxes – gradual decrease in escape times

Watson

Behaviourist

Reward/punishment learning

Little Albert trained to be afraid of furry animals

Skinner

Operant/Instrumental Conditioning

Reward learning response shaping

Schedules of reinforcement

Pavlov

Type 1/Respondent Conditioning

Neutral stimulus paired with reward

Acquisition CS-US Pairings
Extinction CS Alone
Spontaneous Recovery CS Alone

INTELLIGENCE DISTRIBUTION

Banks & Flora – Fish Cows Dogs Apes Humans

Justification for rankings:

  • Appearance

  • Jerison: ratio brain weight to body weight

  • Anaxagoras: all animals equally intelligent just only some animals can access hypothetical nouse

  • MacPhail: null hypothesis – only humans are more intelligent

  • Romanes: ranked on where they appeared in fossil record

Jerison:

Brain weight (E)

Body weight (P)

Cephalisation Index = E / P2/3

Learning: relatively permanent change in behaviour caused by experience

Operant: Response Food

Classical: Stimulus Food

Problems with speed of learning as a measure of animal intelligence

  • Unexpected between-species differences

  • Skard: looked at the rate at which rats and humans can get thro’ a maze without making errors

  • Difficult to equate perceptual demands of test

  • Difficult to equate motivational demands of test - Bitterman (1975) systematic variation

comparing species’ intelligence is hampered by contextual variables

  • Within-species differences in speed of learning

Garcia & Koelling

Train Test Vol drunk

Saline illness

Saline shock

Saline

Saline

Small

Large

LTW illness

LTW shock

LTW

LTW

Large

Small

Learning depends on outcome:

Saline paired with illness NOT shock

LTW paired with shock NOT illness

External stimulus external outcome

Internal stimulus internal outcome

Garcia Effect = seeing a light is readily learned when paired with a shock

ANIMAL MEMORY

= current behaviour under influence of past experience

Location of hidden food Vander-Wall Clark’s nutcracker bird remember 3000 different location
Photos Vaughan & Greene Over time, pigeons could discriminate which of the 320 photos food
Periodic timing

= ability to respond at a given time

Circadian Clock – 24hr

Interval timing = ability of animals to respond on the basis of specific durations
Church & Gibbon

Lights turned off

Reward given if rats pressed lever 4 seconds after light turned back on

= rats remember duration

Number Clever Hans Couldn’t actually count, just responded to tiny human signals
Meck & Church Rats can time 2 different intervals simultaneously
Brannon & Terrace Monkeys trained to touch number of items in increasing order on a touch screen: using novel shaped and sized stimuli
5 day old chicks Associated smaller numbers with L space, larger numbers with R space
Pepperberg Alex the parrot: could count up to 6 and order numbers based on magnitude
Categories - feature Herrnstein, Loveland & Cable Tested pigeons’ ability to respond +vely to new pics of trees
Cerella

Pigeons shown 80 photos

Reward for responding to pics of oak leaves

Only 24 slides needed for them to be able to discriminate

STM - habituation Whitlow Distractor stimuli between S1 and S2 habituated to S1
Wagner

Terminating S1 leaves a decaying rep of itself

S2 shown before decay matches S1 = habituation

Beatty & Shavali

Eventually remember where they have/not visited on radial arm maze

After 4hrs – remember

Long than 4 hrs - errors

Roberts

24 locations on radial arm maze – soon less errors

BUT rats automatically turn R

LTM Consolidation Rehearsal needed pot evet so the memory can later be retrieved
Duncan ECS shock post learning prevents rehearsal
Retrieval Failure to retrieve a memory due to absence of cues to retrieve
Reactivation

Activating memory by presenting some cues that were present at the time of the event

Deweer, Sara & Hars

Explanations for Categorisation

  • Innate categories

  • Exemplar learning

  • Feature learning

  • Exemplar learning + stimulus generalisation

Habituation = reduction in responsiveness to a stimulus due to its repeated presentation

depends on memory of the repeated stimuli

Properties of STM

Radial Maze: Olton (1978)

  • Capacity - at least 8 items

  • Duration - up to 4 hours

  • Content - landmarks

ASSOCIATIVE LEARNING = when CS alone

Drugs

Bonson: drug using Ps who watched a drug film = more cravings than non-users

Holland:

Stage 1 Stage 2 Test

Tone Wintergreen + Sucrose

Noise Peppermint + Sucrose

Wintergreen + Sucrose LiCL

Tone + Sucrose

Noise + Sucrose

Tone/Noise evokes a memory of the taste produces the same response

The influence of the Unconditioned Stimulus on the Conditioned Response

USs have Specific (unique eg flavour) and Affective (in common with other stimuli - pleasant/unpleasant) qualities

Affective qualities can be Appetitive (pleasant) or Aversive (unpleasant)

Autoshaping in pigeons

Press a lever, get food response time decreases

Preparatory Response

= CR that suggests the animals is preparing for the imminent US

Salivation during CS that signals US general increase in activity

Conditioned Suppression decrease in movement

Compensatory Response and drug tolerance

Compensatory CR = CR elicited by a CS that opposed the effects of the US

CR is in preparation for US Eg salivation in Pavlov’s dogs, freezing in conditioned fear
CR is a substitute for US Eg autoshaping in pigeons
CR opposes the action of the US Rat placed in cold box produces a CR that compensates for cold

Siegel (2005) = reviews role of conditioning in drug tolerance

Tolerance = decrease in sensitivity to a drug as a result of...

Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our Intro to Biological and Cognitive Psych (1st year) Notes.

More Intro To Biological And Cognitive Psych (1st Year) Samples