Claimant, Phones4U, operated a chain of mobile phone stores and had a website, “phones4u.co.uk”.
Defendant registered a website in 1999 called “phone4u.co.uk” which offered mobile phones; in 2000 Defendant offered to sell domain name to Claimant for large sum of money.
Defendant’s website stated that it was unconnected with Phones4U.
On facts, Defendant’s acts were actually likely to divert business from Claimant.
Public were likely to be deceived that Defendant’s website was that of Claimant
Defendant then sought to take advantage of initial deception to make money himself.
Thus passing off.
IP law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambridge. Th...
Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get StartedThese product samples contain the same concepts we cover in this case.
Intellectual Property Law | Passing Off Notes (18 pages) |
Intellectual Property Law | Passing Off Cases (10 pages) |
Intellectual Property Law | Trade Mark Case Law Notes (68 pages) |