Defendant were dealers in Internet domain names; had deliberately registered domain names consisting of names of trademarks of well-known businesses without those business’s consent.
Claimant, one company whose name had been registered by Defendant in numerous forms, sued Defendant for passing off.
Is passing off where Defendant is equipped with, or intends to equip another with, an instrument of fraud.
Whether a name is instrument of fraud is matter to be determined by all the circumstances; including:
Similarity of names
Intention of Defendant
On facts, names were instruments of fraud.
I.e. Defendant intended to extract money from Claimant by express or implied threat that Defendant or someone else could make use of its name.
Therefore was passing off and threatened passing off.
Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get StartedThese product samples contain the same concepts we cover in this case.
Intellectual Property Law | Passing Off Notes (18 pages) |
Intellectual Property Law | Passing Off Cases (10 pages) |