C&P Haulage v Middleton [1983] 3 All ER 94
Judgement for the case C&P Haulage v Middleton
Table Of Contents
Defendant rented offices from Plaintiff for a period and in the contract it said that he could not remove any fixings that Defendant added to Plaintiff’s office even after the contract expired.
Defendant made improvements before being kicked out illegally, which the courts dealt with. Later on he claimed damages for the fixings.
CA dismissed his claim.
Ackner LJ
Said it was not the place of the court to put Plaintiff in a better position than he would have been in had the contract been fulfilled, as would happen if they made an award for the fixings.
For Further Study on C&P Haulage v Middleton
These are detailed case summaries (excerpts from cases - not paraphrase...
These are detailed case summaries (excerpts from cases - not paraphrase...
Need instant answers? Our AI exam tutor is here to help.
Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get StartedSimilar Cases
Related Product Samples
These product samples contain the same concepts we cover in this case.
Contract law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambrid...
Since 2010, Oxbridge Notes has been a trusted education marketplace, supplying high-quality materials from top achievers at universities like Oxford, Cambridge, LSE, Harvard, and Yale.