Consistent Group v Kalwak [2008] EWCA Civ 430
Judgement for the case Consistent Group v Kalwak
Table Of Contents
Kalwak got work through employment agency, CG, at business WCF.
The agreement between Kalwak and CG stated that she wasn’t an employee, that it was a zero hour agreement, and that she had a right of substitution (provided the substitute was suitable). She was also free to work for other agencies at the time.
Her agreement was terminated when she tried to join a union, and it is unlawful to sack ‘employees’ for trying to join unions under legislation.
CA said Kalwak was clearly not an employee of Kalwak and that the agreement was not a sham.
For Further Study on Consistent Group v Kalwak
Labour Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambridge...
Need instant answers? Our AI exam tutor is here to help.
Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get StartedSimilar Cases
Related Product Samples
These product samples contain the same concepts we cover in this case.
| Labour Law | Personal Scope Of Labour Law Notes (36 pages) |
| Labour Law | The Employment Relationship Notes (71 pages) |
Labour Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambridge...
Since 2010, Oxbridge Notes has been a trusted education marketplace, supplying high-quality materials from top achievers at universities like Oxford, Cambridge, LSE, Harvard, and Yale.