Someone recently bought our

students are currently browsing our notes.


Couturier v Hastie

[1856] 5 HLC 672

Case summary last updated at 02/01/2020 16:56 by the Oxbridge Notes in-house law team.

Judgement for the case Couturier v Hastie

P contracted to sell corn to D but the corn deteriorated and was sold before the date of the sale and D refused to pay. P sued for the money, claiming that D had really bought the rights from the shipping documents so that any loss to the corn would be the risk of D, not P. HL found for D, saying that (1) the document was for the sale of the corn itself and (2) the risk of mistake as to the existence of the document would go with the seller and (3) the non-existence of the corn meant that there was no consideration.

Lord Cairns: Where there is nothing to be sold, D cannot be compelled to pay for the thing that doesn’t exist. Smith: This doesn’t say whether he means there is no contract or whether the contract does exist but that P has not performed

Have you seen Oxbridge Notes' best Contract Law study materials?

Our law notes have been a popular underground sensation for 10 years:

  • Written by Oxford & Cambridge prize-winning graduates
  • Includes copious academic commentary in summary form
  • Concise structure relating cases and statutes into an easy-to-remember whole
  • Covers all major cases for LLB exams
  • Satisfaction guaranteed refund policy
  • Recently updated
Contract Law Notes

Contract Law Notes >>