Someone recently bought our

students are currently browsing our notes.


Cremdean Properties v Nash

[1977] 244 EG 547

Case summary last updated at 02/01/2020 15:40 by the Oxbridge Notes in-house law team.

Judgement for the case Cremdean Properties v Nash

CA: Court of Appeal considered whether a disclaimer contained in a footnote to special conditions of sale was effective to exclude liability, having regard to the provisions of section 3 of the 1967 Act. P claimed that the footnote was a statement of opinion and not a representation. CA dismissed this claim, saying that the distinction was false. 
Bridge LJ: “For my part the distinction seems to be one without a difference. The word 'representation' is an extremely wide term; I cannot see why one should not be making a representation when giving information or when stating one's opinion or belief. To my mind it would be a retrograde step if the court were to give the word 'representation' when it appears in the Misrepresentation Act 1967 any narrow or limited construction, less wide than the perfectly natural meaning of the word.” However, he also said that the court are unwilling to “allow such ingenuity of language to defeat the plain purpose at which s.3 is aimed”. 

Have you seen Oxbridge Notes' best Contract Law study materials?

Our law notes have been a popular underground sensation for 10 years:

  • Written by Oxford & Cambridge prize-winning graduates
  • Includes copious academic commentary in summary form
  • Concise structure relating cases and statutes into an easy-to-remember whole
  • Covers all major cases for LLB exams
  • Satisfaction guaranteed refund policy
  • Recently updated
Contract Law Notes

Contract Law Notes >>