This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

R v Curr [1968] 2 QB 944

By Oxbridge Law TeamUpdated 04/01/2024 07:02

Judgement for the case R v Curr

Table Of Contents

  • Defendant organised a money lending scheme, getting his assistants to go and collect other families’ allowances owed to other people.

  • CA quashed his conviction on the basis that the assistants didn’t know that they weren’t entitled to collect the money. Therefore the assistants didn’t know that they were being incited and hence Defendant could not be said to have incited them.

  • However, provided Defendant believed they knew, Ashworth argues, it ought to have been a case of incitement. 

Any comments or edits about this case? Get in touch

For Further Study on R v Curr

Need instant answers? Our AI exam tutor is here to help.

Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️

Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.

Get Started

Related Product Samples

These product samples contain the same concepts we cover in this case.

Claim every advantage to get a first in law
Criminal Law Notes
1,072 total pages
662 purchased

Criminal Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambrid...