This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

Danjaq LLC v OHIM [2009] Case T-435/05

By Oxbridge Law TeamUpdated 04/01/2024 07:13

Judgement for the case Danjaq LLC v OHIM

Table Of Contents

  • Claimant sought to register trade mark ‘DR NO’.

Held

  • Sign must be distinctive as indicator of commercial origin, and not of artistic origin

  • ‘Dr No’ is seen as distinguishing one Bond film from another, and not as designation of commercial origin.

Any comments or edits about this case? Get in touch

For Further Study on Danjaq LLC v OHIM

Intellectual Property Law Notes
1,014 total pages
1033 purchased

IP law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambridge. Th...

Need instant answers? Our AI exam tutor is here to help.

Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️

Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.

Get Started
Claim every advantage to get a first in law
Intellectual Property Law Notes
446 total pages
22 purchased

My notes cover all the main cases in intellectual property law. They a...