Fayed (F) wanted to take over a company and a parliamentary commission undertook a public report into his conduct which X had attacked.
The report was bad for F who argued that its contents breached Article 6 – Right to a fair trial and to be heard before a tribunal.
European Court of Human Rights said that Article 6 was only engaged where there was a dispute decisively determining F’s civil rights or obligations.
Clearly that wasn’t the case here so Article 6 wasn’t engaged.
Here, the parliamentary committee was carrying out an investigatory function.
Administrative Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and C...
Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get StartedThese product samples contain the same concepts we cover in this case.