Hugin v Commision [1979] Case 22/78
Judgement for the case Hugin v Commision
Table Of Contents
Took view that Hugin was dominant in market of spare parts for its own cash machines.
Lipton was firm that serviced Hugin's machines and couldn't use any other spare parts, so COURT took view that although there could be a market for spare parts in general, in present case, the market had to be very narrowly defined and comprise only spare parts for Hugin's machines.
For Further Study on Hugin v Commision
My notes cover all the main cases in intellectual property law. They a...
Need instant answers? Our AI exam tutor is here to help.
Ask questions š Get answers š It's simple šļøššļø
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get StartedSimilar Cases
Related Product Samples
These product samples contain the same concepts we cover in this case.
| Intellectual Property Law | Trade Mark Case Law Notes (68 pages) |
Competition Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Camb...
Since 2010, Oxbridge Notes has been a trusted education marketplace, supplying high-quality materials from top achievers at universities like Oxford, Cambridge, LSE, Harvard, and Yale.