This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

R v Amber Valley DC, ex parte Jackson [1985] 1 WLR 298

By Oxbridge Law TeamUpdated 04/01/2024 07:01

Judgement for the case R v Amber Valley DC, ex parte Jackson

Table Of Contents

  • One group of councillors supported a planning application. It was then asked whether that prevented a member of the group sitting on the committee which would assess it.

  • The court held that members could not be so disqualified. 

Woolf J

  • Political bias, unlike financial interest or previous relations between the parties, cannot exclude members supporting the application from sitting on the committee.

If this was to be regarded as disqualifying the district council from dealing with the planning application, then if that disqualification is to be avoided, the members of the planning committee at any rate will have to adopt standards of conduct which I suspect will be almost impossible to achieve in practice.

Any comments or edits about this case? Get in touch

For Further Study on R v Amber Valley DC, ex parte Jackson

GDL Constitutional and Administrative Law Notes
509 total pages
100 purchased

A collection of the best GDL notes the director of Oxbridge Notes (an O...

Administrative Law Notes
1,167 total pages
443 purchased

Administrative Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and C...

Need instant answers? Our AI exam tutor is here to help.

Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️

Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.

Get Started
Claim every advantage to get a first in law
Administrative Law Notes
1,167 total pages
443 purchased

Administrative Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and C...