Someone recently bought our

students are currently browsing our notes.


Re Selectmove

[1995] 2 All ER 531

Case summary last updated at 02/01/2020 12:42 by the Oxbridge Notes in-house law team.

Judgement for the case Re Selectmove

 D owed revenue, P, tax and NIC and tried to offer the tax collector a proposal to stagger the owed payments. He said he would have to check it with his superiors and tell the company if it was unacceptable. D heard nothing more. CA held that the silence of the tax collector, who did not himself have the authority to make such an agreement obviously meant there was no acceptance of the contract, while there was no consideration since delayed payment of a debt already owing is clearly not consideration. Gibson LJ said that Beer was analogous and would have to be disregarded if the Williams doctrine was extended to cases of debt. As for the argument that the Revenue had accepted the terms, this was wrong because the tax collector had no authority to make an acceptance, or even to bind his superiors to do so. 

Have you seen Oxbridge Notes' best Contract Law study materials?

Our law notes have been a popular underground sensation for 10 years:

  • Written by Oxford & Cambridge prize-winning graduates
  • Includes copious academic commentary in summary form
  • Concise structure relating cases and statutes into an easy-to-remember whole
  • Covers all major cases for LLB exams
  • Satisfaction guaranteed refund policy
  • Recently updated
Contract Law Notes

Contract Law Notes >>