Someone recently bought our

students are currently browsing our notes.


Scotch Premier Meat Ltd v Burns

[2000] IRLR 639

Case summary last updated at 18/02/2020 21:23 by the Oxbridge Notes in-house law team.

Judgement for the case Scotch Premier Meat Ltd v Burns

D was considering two options to save the company: One was to sell the business, and the other was to sell its assets. The latter plan would involve mass redundancies (i.e. 150 within the 90 day period required by s.188). Question was whether there was a need for a consultation process to begin, given that it hadn’t yet been decided whether the plan involving redundancies would occur, given that s.188 duty arose when the employer was “proposing” to make people redundant etc. The EAT held that here there was such a ‘proposal’ and so a s.188 consultation had to occur. It construed the word ‘proposing’ as including this situation in which an employer had decided to take one of the two proposed actions, one of which would lead to redundancies. However the word propose was thought to have a narrower meaning than mere ‘contemplation’. 
Lord Johnston: The word ‘propose’ connotes a state of the employer’s mind (intention). “Contemplation enjoins a large number of options or at least more than one, while 'propose' enjoins a specific proposal. We therefore incline to the view that it is extremely difficult if not impossible to construe 'propose' as wide enough to cover 'contemplation”. Because of the decision to actually do one of the two options, this wasn’t mere contemplation.

Have you seen Oxbridge Notes' best Labour Law study materials?

Our law notes have been a popular underground sensation for 10 years:

  • Written by Oxford & Cambridge prize-winning graduates
  • Includes copious academic commentary in summary form
  • Concise structure relating cases and statutes into an easy-to-remember whole
  • Covers all major cases for LLB exams
  • Satisfaction guaranteed refund policy
  • Recently updated
Labour Law Notes

Labour Law Notes >>