Someone recently bought our

students are currently browsing our notes.

X

Stewart v Moray Council

[2006] IRLR 592

Case summary last updated at 18/02/2020 21:32 by the Oxbridge Notes in-house law team.

Judgement for the case Stewart v Moray Council

D received a request to negotiate an agreement from between 10% and 40% of its employees. The council took the view that various collective agreements in place together amounted to a pre-existing agreement, and duly decided to hold a ballot under reg. 8. EAT held that the agreement insufficiently detailed the way the council should inform and consult employees (condition for pre-existing agreement- see above). The agreement stated that it was ‘a forum for discussion and/or consultation on a range of matters not subject to national bargaining’. Hence the council wasn’t entitled to hold a ballot and instead had to start on negotiations. NB EAT also said that both the whole overall agreement, as well as those individual ones comprising it, had to satisfy the 4 conditions. 

Stewart v Moray Council crops up in following areas of law