2 principles are clear:
For application of no-conflict rule, no need for company to have ‘proprietary interest’ in opportunity diverted
However after director leaves office, may be liable under:
No profit rule
If business opportunity is treated as ‘property’ of the company
Even if competing directorships give rise to potential conflict of interest, can be remedied by consent of boards of both companies
CMS Dolphin is WRONG.
No such thing as joint liability for breach of trust.
Where director himself receives profit from breach of duty and puts it into a company, director is liable for knowing receipt.
Plus company potentially liable for knowing receipt.
Where profits from a director’s breach of duty are paid directly to a company:
If company is alter ego of director, Court will pierce corporate veil
Thus third party company liable to director’s original company
If director owns large number of shares in company but it is not a mere alter ego,
Director is not personally liable to account for profits made
Company may be liable for knowing receipt
Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get StartedThese product samples contain the same concepts we cover in this case.
Company law | Directors' Duties 2 Cases (7 pages) |
Company law | Directors' Duties Ii Notes (25 pages) |