This is an extract of our Intention document, which we sell as part of our GDL Criminal Law Notes collection written by the top tier of Cambridge/Bpp/College Of Law students.
The following is a more accessble plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our GDL Criminal Law Notes. Due to the challenges of extracting text from PDFs, it will have odd formatting:
[MENS REA: INTENTION]
Mens Rea for murder = MALICE AFORETHOUGHT o
Misleading term: no requirement for malice and doesn't need to be premeditated
Even if acting on compassionate terms there will be murder - Inglis (2011) - mercy killing is no defence in English law
1. An intention to kill (express malice) OR
2. An intention to cause GBH (implied malice) - R v Vickers
GBH has the meaning of really serious harm as defined in DPP v Smith and also Saunders
Types of Intention: Direct + Oblique Direct Intent:
Where the consequence is what the defendant wants to happen - purpose/objective of him acting
Even if his chances of success are slim
The general rule
R v Maloney - Lord Bridge made it clear intention should be given its ordinary meaning - "desire"/"motive"
Where the aim/purpose is to commit the actus reus
Judges should refrain from giving further explanation as to the meaning of 'intention' (unless jury asks for it)
Rare: where intent is the only form of mens rea (e.g. murder, s 18 GBH with intent) - not where recklessness is an alternative
Oblique intent is where the result is not the defendant's purpose but a side effect that he accepts as an inevitable accompaniment to his direct intention
Debate over what is required to find oblique intent: 1
Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our GDL Criminal Law Notes.