Someone recently bought our

students are currently browsing our notes.


The Burden And Standard Of Proof Notes

Law Notes > Criminal Procedure and Evidence Notes

Updates Available  

A more recent version of these The Burden And Standard Of Proof notes – written by Oxford students – is available here.

The following is a more accessble plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our Criminal Procedure and Evidence Notes. Due to the challenges of extracting text from PDFs, it will have odd formatting:

Supervision 4 - The Burden and Standard of Proof The burden of proof
? In criminal case, legal burden normally rests with the Crown. Who will have to prove the accused's guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
? In civil case, party bearing legal burden need only establish the case on a balance of probabilities (51%).
? Governing principle is that onus lies on prosecution to prove all elements of the offence (Woolmington).
? In civil proceedings where defendants rely on criminal defences, burden of proof is on defendant (Ashley).
? Exceptions to the general rule: o If accused raises insanity defence, it is for him to establish on a balance of probabilities the required elements (M'Naghten). o Statute may expressly place legal burden on defence.
? For example, defence of diminished responsibility. o Statute may impliedly cast burden on defence.
? Summary offences: "Where the defendant ... relies for his defence on any exception, exemption, proviso, excuse or qualification ... the burden of proving [that defence] ... shall be on him" (Magistrates Court Act 1980, s.101)
? Often down to the court to interpret the legislation.
? Policy factors need to be considered (Hunt). Reversed approach in Edwards whereby offences with an exception (as a defence) can justify reversal of burden. The evidential burden
? Evidential burden for prosecution involves establishing a prima facie case. o Use Galbraith test.
? Defence burden discharged by showing evidence that is beyond 'fanciful or speculative' (Ciccarelli). The tactical burden
? In Schama v Abramovich, held that if you are in possession of recently stolen property, jury can infer that D knew or believed that the property was stolen. o D can rebut the evidential burden by bringing some evidence to the contrary. If he does not do so, he is liable to be convicted. o It is about trying to avoid losing a case.
? Once defence have satisfied their evidential burden, prosecution have legal burden to disprove the defence. The judge's 'invisible burden'
? If there is evidence to support a defence, judge must be alert to place that defence before the jury (Calvert).
? But there may be some cases where it would undermine the fairness of the trial if an alternative verdict were left to the jury. o Test is what an ordinary, knowledgeable and alert trial judge would do (Coutts). Option should be left to jury even if counsel disagree. The standard of proof

Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our Criminal Procedure and Evidence Notes.