Someone recently bought our

students are currently browsing our notes.

X

Applying The Law To Difficult Cases

Law Notes > Medical Law Notes

This is an extract of our Applying The Law To Difficult Cases document, which we sell as part of our Medical Law Notes collection written by the top tier of Oxford students.

The following is a more accessble plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our Medical Law Notes. Due to the challenges of extracting text from PDFs, it will have odd formatting:

Applying the Law to difficult cases The administration of pain-relieving drugs

*
The general principles o If D gives P drugs knowing and in order to kill P, and death results, then this can be murder
? Bland

*
Lord Goff: o It is not lawful for a doctor to administer a drug to his patient to bring about his death
? Even if that course of treatment is prompted by a humanitarian desire to end suffering, however great that might be. o How about where D gives P drugs knowing they will likely kill P, but with the intention to relieve P's pain, not to kill
? Bland

*
Lord Goff o It is an established rule that a doctor may, when caring a for P who is dying from a terminal disease
? lawfully administer painkilling drugs despite that fact that he knows the incidental effect of that application will be to abbreviate the patient's life o Such a decision may properly be made as part of the care of the living patient and his best interests
? And on this basis, the treatment is lawful.
? R v Cox: D injected a lethal amount of potassium chloride in order to kill P who was suffering from intense pain. P had repeatedly asked D to kill him, and eventually D relented. The drug itself only shortened P's life, and otherwise had no analgesic value so could not be classed as pain relief.

*
Foster: He was only charged with attempted murder, which was a tactical move by the prosecution, o as juries will very often acquit in full murder prosecutions owing to the mandatory life sentence. Persistent vegetative state

*
Definition o PVS patients cannot be kept alive unaided and without the use of a life support machine
? However, they are not always completely immobile, and can retain some auditory or visual stimuli - although the amount depends on the degree suffered o They cannot eat or drink unaided, and while it can never be certain that the condition is irrecoverable
? Most will not recover and only stay alive until some natural disease gets them, or treatment is withdrawn.

*
The Law o Doctors must comply with any advance directives issued by the patient which state he does not want any life-sustaining treatment
? Or else the test is whether it is in the best interests of P to require the treatment to be offered

Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our Medical Law Notes.

More Medical Law Samples